2018
DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.8b01452
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Confocal Raman Microscopy for in Situ Measurement of Phospholipid–Water Partitioning into Model Phospholipid Bilayers within Individual Chromatographic Particles

Abstract: The phospholipid-water partition coefficient is a commonly measured parameter that correlates with drug efficacy, small-molecule toxicity, and accumulation of molecules in biological systems in the environment. Despite the utility of this parameter, methods for measuring phospholipid-water partition coefficients are limited. This is due to the difficulty of making quantitative measurements in vesicle membranes or supported phospholipid bilayers, both of which are small-volume phases that challenge the sensitiv… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, RTM, with a typical processing capacity of 0.2 particles per min, is not considered a high-throughput methodology 71 . RTM can, however, be used to obtain interesting, unique information not only for EVs 57,60,61,[70][71][72][73][74][75][76][77] but also for many other bioparticles such as liposomes, lipid layers on synthetic nanoparticles and others [78][79][80][81][82][83] .…”
Section: Label-free Methodologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, RTM, with a typical processing capacity of 0.2 particles per min, is not considered a high-throughput methodology 71 . RTM can, however, be used to obtain interesting, unique information not only for EVs 57,60,61,[70][71][72][73][74][75][76][77] but also for many other bioparticles such as liposomes, lipid layers on synthetic nanoparticles and others [78][79][80][81][82][83] .…”
Section: Label-free Methodologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Quantification of each solute was achieved by measuring the intensities of the within-particle Raman scattering from the symmetric ring stretching mode of fluorene or biphenyl (1612 or 1616 cm –1 ) relative to scattering from the CH 2 -twisting modes (1296–1301 cm –1 ) of the C 18 ligands and phospholipid acyl chains, used as an internal standard. Converting these signals to concentrations was achieved by measuring scattering intensities from standard solutions of fluorene and biphenyl in n -heptane (Figures S-4 and S-5). The PAH surface coverages were determined from their CC scattering intensities relative to intensity of the CH 2 twisting mode of the n -alkyl chains, where the CH 2 surface coverage of each of stationary phase was determined from carbon analysis and specific surface area (Supporting Information).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We use confocal Raman microscopy to characterize the degree of chain order of these hybrid bilayers from the ratio of scattering intensities from the asymmetric C–C trans-conformer stretching mode to the symmetric C–C stretching of the gauche conformer. The partitioning of two model PAH molecules, fluorene (planar) versus biphenyl (nonplanar), was determined from their Raman scattering intensities using scattering from the CH 2 –twisting mode of the hybrid bilayer as an internal standard. Interfacial PAH concentrations and corresponding partition coefficients were measured for each of the four hybrid bilayers. The retention selectivities for the planar versus nonplanar PAH compounds determined from the ratios of partition coefficients were found to vary significantly and systematically with the degree of order of the acyl/alkyl chains in the hybrid lipid bilayers.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Confocal Raman microscopy has also been used to investigate the partitioning of small molecules into hybrid-lipid bilayers in C 18 chromatographic silica particles compared to their partitioning into lipid vesicle membranes . While there are structural differences between hybrid (interdigitated) versus vesicle (noninterdigitated) lipid bilayers, a comparison of the pH-dependent partitioning of a model solute (2-(4-isobutylphenyl) propionic acid) showed an equivalent response at low pH for the neutral form of the solute; at high pH, the deprotonated (anionic) form of the solute showed somewhat greater partitioning into the hybrid-bilayer.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Confocal Raman microscopy has also been used to investigate the partitioning of small molecules into hybridlipid bilayers in C 18 chromatographic silica particles compared to their partitioning into lipid vesicle membranes. 26 While there are structural differences between hybrid (interdigitated) versus vesicle (noninterdigitated) lipid bilayers, a comparison of the pH-dependent partitioning of a model solute (2-(4isobutylphenyl) propionic acid) showed an equivalent response at low pH for the neutral form of the solute; at high pH, the deprotonated (anionic) form of the solute showed somewhat greater partitioning into the hybrid-bilayer. This difference likely arises from greater headgroup spacing of the hybrid bilayer that arises from interdigitation, 25 which increases solution-phase contact with hydrophobic regions of the interface and contributes to hybrid bilayer association of the surface-active anionic solute by its lowering of the interfacial tension.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%