2005
DOI: 10.1007/11601548_16
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Confluence of Graph Transformation Revisited

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
55
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
55
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The notion of critical pairs is central in this theory, allowing for conflict detection and analysis. It was developed at first in the area of term rewriting systems (e.g., [6]) and, later, introduced in the area of graph transformation for hypergraph rewriting [7,8] and then for all kinds of transformation systems fitting into the framework of adhesive high-level replacement categories [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The notion of critical pairs is central in this theory, allowing for conflict detection and analysis. It was developed at first in the area of term rewriting systems (e.g., [6]) and, later, introduced in the area of graph transformation for hypergraph rewriting [7,8] and then for all kinds of transformation systems fitting into the framework of adhesive high-level replacement categories [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Determinism directly refers to the notion of confluence (often called the Church-Rosser, or diamond, property) for Gbtls, which has also been proved as undecidable [90]. Confluence and termination are linked by Newman's lemma [82], stating that confluence coincides with local confluence if the system terminates.…”
Section: Determinism Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, the transformations However, as shown in Plump (1993) and Plump (2005), the confluence of critical pairs is not sufficient for this, and we need a slightly stronger version, called strict confluence, which adds the requirement that the preserved elements of the given steps are preserved in the merging steps. This means that elements that are not deleted by one of the original transformations steps must be preserved by the additional transformations that lead to confluence to ensure the applicability of the rules in the bigger context.…”
Section: Functional Behaviour and Efficient Executionmentioning
confidence: 99%