Conflicts about water: Securitizations in a global context

Abstract

In the current literature in International Relations and Conflict Studies, water as a source of conflict is either extremely over-or exceedingly underrated. In order to account for the dynamics of water conflicts, it is argued in this article that the study of water conflicts should be linked to comprehensive theories of social conflict and world society. A theoretical framework is developed based on a combination of securitization theory, modern systems theory and sociological neoinstitutionalism. The usefulness of this framework is illustrated through two empirical cases of water conflicts, namely Spain and Egypt/Sudan. This study contributes to an understanding of the evolution of water conflicts as a result of securitization practices, the dynamics of these conflicts as complex social systems and as the outcome of local adaptations to and of 'world cultural' frames.

It is getting hotter in here: determining and projecting the impacts of global environmental change on drylands

“…Moreover, they are likely to worsen already existing socio-political conflicts and limit the development of agricultural programmes, particularly in regions where water conflicts are already arising (e.g. Egypt, Sudan and Israel [118,119]). …”

An assessment of the effects of Africa's water crisis on food security and management

“…In 1999, these states created the Nile Basin Initiative to establish a framework for cooperative management and "equitable utilization of, and benefit from, the common Nile Basin water resources" (Stetter, 2011). A permanent legal framework, A permanent legal framework, 7 based on negotiations under the initiative, was supposed to be established in 2012.…”

Why do conflicts over scarce renewable resources turn violent? A qualitative comparative analysis

“…Recent political change also has been found to be a triggering INUS condition for violent escalation, but has hardly been considered in cross-case analyses of socio-environmental conflicts. Finally, the relevance of negative othering as an INUS conditions supports the growing, but still small number of constructivist studies which argue for a stronger incorporation of narrative and discursive factors in the research on socioenvironmental conflicts (Frö hlich, 2012;Stetter et al, 2011;Zeitoun et al, 2013).…”