2019
DOI: 10.1111/nph.15747
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conflicting selection on floral scent emission in the orchid Gymnadenia conopsea

Abstract: Summary Floral scent is a crucial trait for pollinator attraction. Yet only a handful of studies have estimated selection on scent in natural populations and no study has quantified the relative importance of pollinators and other agents of selection. In the fragrant orchid Gymnadenia conopsea, we used electroantennographic data to identify floral scent compounds detected by local pollinators and quantified pollinator‐mediated selection on emission rates of 10 target compounds as well as on flowering start, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
71
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
2
71
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, there is growing evidence that plants can plastically respond to increasing temperatures (Farré-Armengol, 2014), drought (Campbell, Sosenski, & Raguso, 2019) or other biotic or abiotic factors (Schiestl, Kirk, Bigler, Cozzolino & Desurmont, 2014) interactions, particularly pollination (Raguso, 2008). Evidence from these studies suggests that selection usually favours the most odorous plants (Majetic et al, 2009;Parachnowitsch, Raguso, & Kessler, 2012), or plants emitting the highest amounts of a few biologically relevant compounds (Chapurlat, Ågren, Anderson, Friberg, & Sletvold, 2019;Parachnowitsch et al, 2012;Schiestl, Huber, & Gomez, 2011). Here, we found no significant selection gradients on total emission rate, nor did we find consistently significant selection differentials on amounts TA B L E 1 Selection gradients β ± SE on plant height, total emission rate and principal components (PCs) of the PCAs performed on floral colour and odour data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, there is growing evidence that plants can plastically respond to increasing temperatures (Farré-Armengol, 2014), drought (Campbell, Sosenski, & Raguso, 2019) or other biotic or abiotic factors (Schiestl, Kirk, Bigler, Cozzolino & Desurmont, 2014) interactions, particularly pollination (Raguso, 2008). Evidence from these studies suggests that selection usually favours the most odorous plants (Majetic et al, 2009;Parachnowitsch, Raguso, & Kessler, 2012), or plants emitting the highest amounts of a few biologically relevant compounds (Chapurlat, Ågren, Anderson, Friberg, & Sletvold, 2019;Parachnowitsch et al, 2012;Schiestl, Huber, & Gomez, 2011). Here, we found no significant selection gradients on total emission rate, nor did we find consistently significant selection differentials on amounts TA B L E 1 Selection gradients β ± SE on plant height, total emission rate and principal components (PCs) of the PCAs performed on floral colour and odour data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chapurlat et al. ), and whether a correlation between these traits and flower size could explain the apparent selection for larger flowers through pollen removal.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It would be interesting to determine whether these traits are subject to current pollinator-mediated selection (cf. Chapurlat et al 2019), and whether a correlation between these traits and flower size could explain the apparent selection for larger flowers through pollen removal.…”
Section: Spur Lengthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…capensis , we estimated the effect of herbivory on selection (Δ S h ) as Srp+ih-Snormalrp (Table ). The standard error for Δ S h was estimated as SEnormalrp+normalih2+SErp2 (Chapurlat et al., ). This standard error was then used to test whether Δ S h was significantly different from zero using a two‐tailed planned comparison.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%