Conflicting relational models as a predictor of (in)justice perceptions and (un)cooperative behavior at work

Arendt, Johannes F. W.; Kugler, Katharina G.; Brodbeck, Felix C.

doi:10.1002/jts5.85

Cited by 5 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 40 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Recruiting participants who lack working experience in natural work settings to study organizational behavior (e.g., knowledge hiding) is frequently outlined as a strong drawback. To address such limitations and relieve research bias, eight out of the nine accessible studies adopted a quantitative multi-study research design, combining experiments with a field study with an additional sample of organizational employees (Arendt et al, 2021, where three experiments were conducted, makes an exception). In the nine studies, scenarios were used to describe the context of knowledge hiding, including factors that might induce knowledge hiding.…”

Section: Extant Studies On Knowledge Hiding Involving Experimentsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Understanding knowledge hiding behaviors in the workplace using a serious game data collection approach

Yang

Ribière

Bartel-Radic

2022

OJAKM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Knowledge hiding, knowledge hoarding, and knowledge withholding have drawn increasing research attention in recent decades. Most researchers approached this topic by collecting quantitative data using questionnaires with self-reported scales. However, the underreporting nature of self-report measurement, particularly when studying sensitive and socially undesirable behavior, has been identified as a prominent limitation in extant research, which shows the urgent need for less biased and more innovative research methods. Scenarios incorporating critical incidents that represent a simulation of actual working conditions appear to be a relevant technique to address the above-mentioned shortcoming. Hence, an experimental design, adopting meticulously crafted scenarios, is worth investigating. This paper presents the value of using serious games/simulations to collect data related to knowledge hiding behaviors as well as the design stages of a knowledge hiding serious game

show abstract

Section: Extant Studies On Knowledge Hiding Involving Experimentsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Understanding knowledge hiding behaviors in the workplace using a serious game data collection approach

Yang

Ribière

Bartel-Radic

2022

OJAKM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Conversely, those who value AR or MP relationships tend to prioritise power and achievement values over benevolence and universalism. A disparity between anticipated and real relationship models resulted in a sense of inequity among employees at work [12,13], and they began to view their supervisors as lacking morals [8]. In clinical samples, different diagnoses were linked to either difficulties or extreme use of specific relational models [14,15].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Relational models theory: Validation and replication for four fundamental relationships

Zakharin

Bates

2023

PLoS ONE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Relational models theory predicts that social relationships are formed from four underlying psychological models: communal sharing, authority ranking, equality matching, and market pricing. Here, in four studies, we test this four-factor model using the 33-item Modes of Relationships Questionnaire (MORQ). In Study 1, we administered the MORQ to N = 347 subjects. A parallel analysis supported the four-factor structure, but several items failed to load on their predicted target factors. In Study 2 (N = 617), we developed a well-fitting four-factor model of the MORQ with a total of 20 items (five items retained for each factor). This model replicated across multiple relationships reported by each subject. In Study 3, we replicated the model in an independent dataset (N = 615). A general factor associated with relationship type was required in both Study 2 and Study 3. In Study 4, we tested the nature of this general factor, finding that it was associated with the closeness of the relationship. The results support the Relational Models four-factor structure of social relationships. Given the mature theory and applications in a wide range of disciplines, from social to organisational psychology, we hope that this compact, valid, and interpretable instrument leads to increased usage of the scale.

show abstract

“…Antara peramal kepada tingkah laku menyembunyikan pengetahuan yang telah dikenalpasti dalam kajian lepas termasuklah faktor perbezaan individu seperti personaliti (Iqbal et al 2020) dan orientasi individu (Rhee & Choi 2017). Terdapat juga faktor-faktor organisasi yang mempengaruhi tingkah laku ini, antaranya: i) gaya kepimpinan seperti kepimpinan beretika (Men et al 2018) dan pertukaran pemimpinpengikut ; ii) iklim persekitaran yang tidak kondusif (Han et al 2020); iii) hubungan antara perorangan seperti ketidakpercayaan (Conelly et al 2012) dan ketidakadilan (Arendt et al 2021); dan iv) layanan buruk seperti tingkah laku kurang sopan (Arshad & Ismail 2018) dan gosip (Yao et al 2020). Walau bagaimanapun, berdasarkan kepada penelitian terhadap literatur, kajian mengenai faktor peramal yang berkaitan dengan kuasa dan pengaruh dalam organisasi masih lagi terhad.…”

unclassified

Kesan Tanggapan Politik Terhadap Tingkah Laku Menyembunyikan Pengetahuan: Konflik sebagai Pengantara

Tajuddin

Arshad

2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ABSTRAKTingkah laku menyembunyikan pengetahuan didapati memberi kesan negatif bukan sahaja kepada pekerja tetapi juga kepada organisasi secara keseluruhan. Sorotan literatur menunjukkan tingkah laku menyembunyikan pengetahuan di tempat kerja dipengaruhi oleh faktor berkaitan diri pekerja dan faktor situasi yang berkaitan dengan organisasi. Kajian ini dijalankan untuk menguji hubungan antara tanggapan politik dengan tingkah laku menyembunyikan pengetahuan dalam kalangan pekerja yang bekerja dalam pasukan. Secara khususnya, kajian ini menghipotesiskan wujudnya kesan langsung tanggapan politik terhadap tingkah laku menyembunyikan pengetahuan, serta kesan tidak langsung menerusi konflik hubungan sebagai pengantara. Model Persamaan Berstruktur digunakan untuk menguji hipotesis berdasarkan data daripada 339 orang ahli akademik yang menjalankan penyelidikan secara berpasukan. Dapatan kajian ini menunjukkan hubungan langsung dan tidak langsung yang signifikan antara tanggapan politik dengan tingkah laku menyembunyikan pengetahuan, serta hubungan tidak langsung menerusi konflik hubungan sebagai pengantara. Secara teorinya, kajian ini menyumbang kepada literatur menerusi penggunaan teori pemuliharaan sumber dalam menerangkan tingkah laku menyembunyikan pengetahuan di tempat kerja. Kata Kunci: Tingkah laku menyembunyikan pengetahuan; tanggapan politik; konflik hubungan, pasukan kerja.

show abstract

Conflicting relational models as a predictor of (in)justice perceptions and (un)cooperative behavior at work

Cited by 5 publications

References 40 publications

Understanding knowledge hiding behaviors in the workplace using a serious game data collection approach

Understanding knowledge hiding behaviors in the workplace using a serious game data collection approach

Relational models theory: Validation and replication for four fundamental relationships

Kesan Tanggapan Politik Terhadap Tingkah Laku Menyembunyikan Pengetahuan: Konflik sebagai Pengantara

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About