2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.ympev.2011.09.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conflicting mitochondrial and nuclear phylogeographic signals and evolution of host-plant shifts in the boreo-montane leaf beetle Chrysomela lapponica

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Variability in the host chemistry existing among species within the genus Salix (Nyman & Julkunen‐Tiitto, ) could contribute to the differences in the gene expression among WFPs. In combination with the beetles’ genetic distinctiveness over wide geographic distances (Mardulyn et al., ), it is not surprising that the expression of a few chemosensory genes differs between populations over such a large geographic distance, even if they are adapted to the same host genus (but not species). Therefore, future studies are encouraged to construct large‐scale phylogeographic analyses of chemosensory gene expression in relation to host chemistry.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Variability in the host chemistry existing among species within the genus Salix (Nyman & Julkunen‐Tiitto, ) could contribute to the differences in the gene expression among WFPs. In combination with the beetles’ genetic distinctiveness over wide geographic distances (Mardulyn et al., ), it is not surprising that the expression of a few chemosensory genes differs between populations over such a large geographic distance, even if they are adapted to the same host genus (but not species). Therefore, future studies are encouraged to construct large‐scale phylogeographic analyses of chemosensory gene expression in relation to host chemistry.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This species is adapted to cold temperatures and is currently restricted to fragmented populations at high altitudes or latitudes. DNA sequence variation for two of the gene fragments sequenced in the current study were included in a phylogeographic study of C. lapponica (Mardulyn et al ). A visual inspection of allele networks inferred in both species highlights common features: strong phylogeographic structure is visible among regions (i.e., mountain ranges), suggesting a long period of isolation among them.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The aims of our study were as follows: (1) to characterize phylogeographic structure within C. aeneicollis ; (2) to illustrate the process of deriving spatially explicit coalescence models from distribution models to test historical hypotheses; (3) to test whether gene flow currently occurs among the main regions of the contemporary range of C. aeneicollis , given its current fragmented distribution and to test whether this gene flow occurred during the last ice age or was a more ancient phenomenon. To avoid the inference of a general pattern from a single case study, we also compared the phylogeographic pattern uncovered for C. aeneicollis to that of another cold‐adapted leaf beetle, C. lapponica (Mardulyn et al ), a closely related species sharing many ecological traits with C. aeneicollis (similar life cycle and feeding exclusively on willow and birch) and characterized by a similarly fragmented distribution in Eurasia.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The primers used were COI-F (5′-ATAATTTTTTTTATAGTTATACC-3′) and COI2-2 [6] for COI , and 5′-TAATATGGCAGATTAGTGCATTGGA-3′ and 5′-GAGACCATTACTTGCTTTCAGTCATCT-3′ ([56], modified from [57]; see [14] for details) for tRNA Leu –COII . Nuclear EF-1α fragment was amplified using primers 5′-GGTATCACCATTGATATTGCHTTDTGGAA-3′ and 5′-ACCAGCAACATAACCACGACG-3′ [58]. Two nuclear 28S rRNA gene fragments were amplified using the primers, 28S-01 (5′-GACTACCCCCTGAATTTAAGCAT-3′) in combination with 28S-R01 (5′-GACTCCTTGGTCCGTGTTTCAAG-3′) for D2–D3 fragment [59] and 28SD4-5-F in combination with 28SD4-5-R for D4–D5 fragment [60].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%