Conflict of interest policies at Australian medical schools

Abstract

BackgroundPharmaceutical industry exposure is widespread during medical training and may affect education and clinical decision‐making. Medical faculties' conflict of interest (COI) policies help to limit this exposure and protect students against commercial influence.AimsOur aim was to investigate the prevalence, content and strength of COI policies at Australian medical schools and changes since a previous assessment conducted in 2009.MethodsWe identified policies by searching medical school and host university websites in January 2021, and contacted deans to identify any missed policies. We applied a modified version of a scorecard developed in previous studies to examine the content of COI policies. All data were coded in duplicate. COI policies were rated on a scale from 0 (no policy) to 2 (strong policy) across 11 items per medical school. Oversight mechanisms and sanctions were also assessed, and current policies were compared with the 2009 study.ResultsOf 155 potentially relevant policies, 153 were university‐wide and two were specific to medical schools. No policies covered sales representatives, on‐site sponsored education or free samples. Oversight of consultancies had improved substantially, with 76% of schools requiring preapproval. Disclosure policies, while usually present, were weak, with no public disclosure required.ConclusionWe found little indication that Australian medical students are protected from commercial influence on medical education, and there has been limited COI policy development within the past decade. More attention is needed to ensure the independence of medical education in Australia.