2015
DOI: 10.1007/s10926-015-9579-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire

Abstract: The simplified model showed the highest reliability and validity, and the factor structure was the simplest/clearest one. The simplified model is recommended for clinical use due to its convenience and precision for assessing the problems of patients with CTS.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
15
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
15
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It is unclear why SSS item 6 has the lowest factor loading )0.397( of all the 19 items in our study. A previous study also showed low factor loadings for this item, and attributed it to the lack of specification of the exact time when numbness occurs, 23 whereas its factor loadings in other studies were higher )ranged from 0.508 to 0.754( than in our study. 20,21 Nonetheless, all the BCTQ-A items in our study loaded on the correct factors, identical to those reported by Atroshi et al, 20 and very similar to those reported by Ortiz-Corredor et al, 21 the only exception being item 1 of the SSS that loaded on factor 3 in the latter study.…”
contrasting
confidence: 76%
“…It is unclear why SSS item 6 has the lowest factor loading )0.397( of all the 19 items in our study. A previous study also showed low factor loadings for this item, and attributed it to the lack of specification of the exact time when numbness occurs, 23 whereas its factor loadings in other studies were higher )ranged from 0.508 to 0.754( than in our study. 20,21 Nonetheless, all the BCTQ-A items in our study loaded on the correct factors, identical to those reported by Atroshi et al, 20 and very similar to those reported by Ortiz-Corredor et al, 21 the only exception being item 1 of the SSS that loaded on factor 3 in the latter study.…”
contrasting
confidence: 76%
“…19 Indeed, it has undergone validation and psychometric analyses 20,21 to determine its appropriateness for the condition; has been validated and applied in Western, 20,22,23 Middle Eastern, 24 and Asian 25,26 populations; and has a strong test and retest validity and reliability. 27 However, it has never previously been tested as a screening tool, despite it asking for symptoms in a more structured and quantified manner.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It contains 8 questions where the higher scores indicate more inappropriate functional status ( 20 ). Boston/Levine scales have been validated and are reliable for Iranian patients ( 18 , 19 , 21 , 22 ). Electro-diagnostic study is a valid and reliable means of confirming the diagnosis of CTS ( 23 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Electro-diagnostic study is a valid and reliable means of confirming the diagnosis of CTS ( 23 ). In electro-diagnostic studies, median sensory peak latency (SNAP) and motor onset latency were evaluated ( 22 , 24 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%