2002
DOI: 10.1177/0013164402238086
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the Cancer Locus of Control Scale

Abstract: Perceptions of control after a cancer diagnosis may have psychological and physical health significance. The control constructs are critical components of the theory of cognitive adaptation. The Cancer Locus of Control scale reflected these theoretical components and was administered to 543 women with a history of breast cancer. Confirmatory factor analysis was conducted to assess the measurement factor structure of the Cancer Locus of Control. The results supported a three-factor model of the Cancer Locus of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The analysis of TOCA's structural equation model by using a randomly assigned validation sample (n = 1,719) showed that RMSEA = 0.052 and SRMR = 0.051, that NFI, IFI, NNFI, CFI were all greater than 0.85, and that GFI, AGFI, and PGFI were 0.769, 0.754, and 0.722, respectively. The TOCA adequately satisfied standard tests of goodness of fit ( Janssen, Jonge, and Bakker 1999;Henderson, Donatelle, and Acock 2002;Hau, Wen, and Cheng 2004).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…The analysis of TOCA's structural equation model by using a randomly assigned validation sample (n = 1,719) showed that RMSEA = 0.052 and SRMR = 0.051, that NFI, IFI, NNFI, CFI were all greater than 0.85, and that GFI, AGFI, and PGFI were 0.769, 0.754, and 0.722, respectively. The TOCA adequately satisfied standard tests of goodness of fit ( Janssen, Jonge, and Bakker 1999;Henderson, Donatelle, and Acock 2002;Hau, Wen, and Cheng 2004).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Survey questions were initially based on a literature review of validated and widely adopted patient experience instruments [ 15 – 17 ] and consultation with local experts in hospital management. A pilot test of the questionnaire was conducted in 2013 among 5,569 outpatients at three Tier 3 hospitals, five Tier 2 hospitals and eight community health centers (Tier 1); psychometric analysis using the pilot data indicated high construct validity based on standard tests of goodness of fit in structural equation models [ 18 , 19 ] and high internal reliability for all questions included (overall Cronbach’s alpha = 0.97). We provided goodness of fit statistics and internal reliability measures for individual dimensions as well as the entire questionnaire for both the 2013 data (pilot) and the 2014 data (used in this study) in S1 Text .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Impact of Event scale (IES) 37 , a 15-item instrument, was used to assess subjective distress about cancer-related concerns in the previous week. The control over the cause of their cancer and course of cancer subscales were used from the Cancer Locus of Control scale (CLOC) 38 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The control over the cause of their cancer and course of cancer subscales were used from the Cancer Locus of Control scale. 38…”
Section: Cognitive Predictorsmentioning
confidence: 99%