2008
DOI: 10.1086/587874
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Confirmation of the Remarkable Compactness of Massive Quiescent Galaxies at z ~ 2.3: Early-Type Galaxies Did not Form in a Simple Monolithic Collapse

Abstract: Using deep near-infrared spectroscopy, Kriek et al. found that ∼45% of massive galaxies at have evolved z ∼ 2.3 stellar populations and little or no ongoing star formation. Here we determine the sizes of these quiescent galaxies using deep, high-resolution images obtained with HST/NIC2 and laser guide star (LGS)-assisted Keck/adaptive optics (AO). Considering that their median stellar mass is , the galaxies are remarkably small, with 11 1.7 # 10 M , a median effective radius kpc. Galaxies of similar mass in th… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

33
397
3
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 667 publications
(435 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
33
397
3
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This large scatter is consistent with the large range of sersic index observed by van Dokkum et al (2011) in a sample of massive galaxies at z = 1 − 1.5. Szomoru et al 2012).…”
Section: Classical Spheroids and Exponential Discssupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This large scatter is consistent with the large range of sersic index observed by van Dokkum et al (2011) in a sample of massive galaxies at z = 1 − 1.5. Szomoru et al 2012).…”
Section: Classical Spheroids and Exponential Discssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…High-redshift spheroids are much more compact than galaxies of similar mass at z=0 (Daddi et al 2005;Trujillo et al 2006;Toft et al 2007;van Dokkum et al 2008;Cimatti et al 2008). These galaxies with stellar masses of ∼10 11 M ⊙ at z = 1.5 − 2 have typical effective radii of ∼2 kpc, a factor ∼3 smaller than present-day spheroids and a factor ∼2 lower than extended discs with similar mass at the same redshift (Patel et al 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although this conclusion is drawn from limited numbers, the low fraction of sources with Hα emission lines in our sample suggests that most of the sources probably don't have much ongoing star formation (SFR < 0.5 M yr −1 ) and so their formation epoch might be quite high. This would be contrary to the idea of the giant elliptical assembly epoch being z ∼ 2−3 (e.g., van Dokkum et al 2008;Kriek et al 2008), but is consistent with results from SED age fitting of stellar populations, which point to z form > 3 (e.g., Eisenhardt et al 2008). The discrepancy may be resolved if subclumps form early and merge without inducing much star formation (i.e.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…Such evolution has been observed for some time (Bell et al 2004;Brown et al 2007) in surveys of massive field galaxies. Additional significant growth of the massive red galaxy population occurs at z > 1 van Dokkum et al 2008;Taylor et al 2009;Whitaker et al 2010), and this may likely be true in all environments. We therefore consider the possibility that our cluster sample selects, at least in part, a continuous evolutionary sequence that experiences star formation over an extended period leading to an increase in stellar mass on the red sequence.…”
Section: Red Sequence Growthmentioning
confidence: 97%