2019
DOI: 10.1007/s11187-019-00155-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Configurations of effectuation, causation, and bricolage: implications for firm growth paths

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
57
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
3
57
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Following the recommendations of prior fsQCA studies (e.g., An et al, 2019; Schiehll, Lewellyn, & Muller-Kahle, 2017; Schneider & Wagemann, 2012), we vary the consistency thresholds, frequency thresholds, and calibration strategies to check the robustness of the results. The results are summarized in Table 6.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Following the recommendations of prior fsQCA studies (e.g., An et al, 2019; Schiehll, Lewellyn, & Muller-Kahle, 2017; Schneider & Wagemann, 2012), we vary the consistency thresholds, frequency thresholds, and calibration strategies to check the robustness of the results. The results are summarized in Table 6.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In transforming economies, such as China, central authorities have made big strides encouraging entrepreneurship. However, many new ventures face resource constraints (An et al, 2019). Our results reveal that young firms could choose an either-or BM design to achieve high growth.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, to date, most of the effectuation literature remains high-level, examining the performance implications of effectual versus causal decision logics (e.g. An et al , 2020; Berends et al , 2014; Fischer, 2012; Frese et al , 2020; Packard and Clark, 2020; Reymen et al , 2015; Smolka et al , 2018) while largely overlooking the microfoundational mechanisms of such emergence processes. As a result, we continue to lack a sound theoretical basis for many of the theorized mechanisms of effectuation theory (Arend et al , 2015; Welter et al , 2016).…”
Section: Implications and Future Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…“Microfoundations” refer to the (often individual-level) underpinnings of socioeconomic phenomena (Barney and Felin, 2013), such as entrepreneurial opportunities, from or through which such phenomena emerge. There has been some recent work in developing microfoundations for effectuation theory, but these efforts have so far focused on the determination between a causal or effectual decision logic (An et al , 2020; Berends et al , 2014; Fisher, 2012; Frese et al , 2020; Kerr and Coviello, 2020; Packard and Clark, 2020; Reymen et al , 2015; Smolka et al , 2018) or the differences between novice and expert entrepreneurs (Dew et al , 2018). One promising avenue of microfoundational exploration connects effectuation theory to design science (Sarasvathy, 2003; Sarasvathy et al , 2008), which advocates a forward-looking, prescriptive approach to science.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%