2003
DOI: 10.1080/03009480310001029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Configuration, history and impact of the Norwegian Channel Ice Stream

Abstract: The Norwegian Channel between Skagerrak, in the southeast, and the continental margin of the northern North Sea, in the northwest, is the result of processes related to repeated ice stream activity through the last 1.1 m yr. In such periods the Skagerrak Trough (700 m deep) has acted as a confluence area for glacial ice from southeastern Norway, southern Sweden and parts of the Baltic. Possibly related to the threshold in the Norwegian Channel off Jæren (250 m deep), the ice stream, on a number of occasions ov… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

3
135
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 154 publications
(138 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
3
135
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It therefore appears that the peak glaciation in Russia was delayed by almost 10 kyr. In southwest Scandinavia this state was reached some time between 32 and 25 kyr BP (Sejrup et al 1994(Sejrup et al , 2003HoumarkNielsen & Kjaer 2003), when SIS eventually merged with the British Isles Ice Sheet. On the northern boundary, SIS coalesced with the Barents Sea Ice Sheet around 22 kyr BP (Svendsen et al 2004, and references therein).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It therefore appears that the peak glaciation in Russia was delayed by almost 10 kyr. In southwest Scandinavia this state was reached some time between 32 and 25 kyr BP (Sejrup et al 1994(Sejrup et al , 2003HoumarkNielsen & Kjaer 2003), when SIS eventually merged with the British Isles Ice Sheet. On the northern boundary, SIS coalesced with the Barents Sea Ice Sheet around 22 kyr BP (Svendsen et al 2004, and references therein).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Quaternary Science Reviews 44, 1-25. [Pre-proof accepted manuscript] 16 grounded ice although whether the two ice sheets were confluent is not known Sejrup et al, 2003;Graham, 2007;Davies et al, 2012).The North Sea was glaciated for a final time during the Late Weichselian (MIS 2). Well-developed seismic, geomorphological and sedimentological evidence now exists for the coalescence of both the Scandinavian and British ice sheets in the northern North Sea (Carr et al, 2006;Bradwell et al, 2007;Graham et al, 2007Graham et al, , 2009Bradwell et al, 2008c) (Figure 3) with ice reaching its maximum extent at the continental margin around 29 ka BP (Sejrup et al, 2009).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Advancing ice during the Pleistocene was, as in large modern-day ice sheets, preferentially fluxed via ice streams (Dowdeswell et al 2002;Ottesen et al 2008Ottesen et al , 2012. The 'footprint' of one such palaeo-ice stream is clearly evident in the Norwegian Channel (Ottesen et al 2012), where a large volume of sediment was transported to the shelf break and deposited as a trough-mouth fan (Sejrup et al 2003;Ottesen et al 2008).…”
Section: Cenozoicmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Analogues for other parts of the glaciogenic environments encountered in the Palaeozoic include over-deepened shelves, cross shelf troughs and trough mouth fans found along the Atlantic margin of Norway (Dowdeswell et al 2002;Sejrup et al 2003;Rise et al 2004;Ottesen et al 2008Ottesen et al , 2012. Controls of reservoir quality in these systems include sediment provenance, sorting and depositional complexity (Fielding et al 2012;van der Vegt et al 2012) as well as syn-and post-depositional deformation by glaciotectonic processes, which can affect stratal depths up to 300 m beneath the glacier bed and tens of kilometres in front of the ice load (Huuse & Lykke-Andersen 2000b;Andersen et al 2005;Buckley 2012;Schack Pedersen 2012).…”
Section: Outcrop and Subsurface Analogues For Glaciogenic Reservoirsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation