2017
DOI: 10.1039/c7lc00851a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Configurable microfluidic platform for investigating therapeutic delivery from biomedical device coatings

Abstract: Advanced biomedical device coatings have shown significant promise in delivery of therapeutics (e.g., small-molecule drugs, proteins) for a wide range of medical interventions ranging from targeted cancer therapy to management of atherosclerosis. In order to accelerate the development of such coatings, there is a need for tools to investigate the loading capacity and release kinetics with high temporal resolution and in a variety of physiological conditions. To address this need, we report a microfluidic platf… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Still, PDMS presents other complications; the soft lithography processes used to manufacture PDMS-based MPSs are not suitable for mass production, because the elasticity of the PDMS microfluidic structures renders them difficult to handle [ 17 ], and PDMS-based MPSs cannot be stored for long durations because PDMS undergoes gradual crosslinking, resulting in structural shrinkage [ 13 ]. Alternatives to PDMS include glass [ 18 , 19 ] and silicon [ 20 ], which have long been used as structural materials for microfluidic devices. However, the fabrication of glass- and silicon-based MPSs often requires harsh reagents; glass-based microfluidic devices are very fragile and not suitable for mass production; and silicon-based microfluidic devices often use photoresist materials, which might have unexpected effects on cultured cells [ 21 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Still, PDMS presents other complications; the soft lithography processes used to manufacture PDMS-based MPSs are not suitable for mass production, because the elasticity of the PDMS microfluidic structures renders them difficult to handle [ 17 ], and PDMS-based MPSs cannot be stored for long durations because PDMS undergoes gradual crosslinking, resulting in structural shrinkage [ 13 ]. Alternatives to PDMS include glass [ 18 , 19 ] and silicon [ 20 ], which have long been used as structural materials for microfluidic devices. However, the fabrication of glass- and silicon-based MPSs often requires harsh reagents; glass-based microfluidic devices are very fragile and not suitable for mass production; and silicon-based microfluidic devices often use photoresist materials, which might have unexpected effects on cultured cells [ 21 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fluid transport in pores a few nanometers across is of relevance in many natural and technological processes [1][2] [3][4] [5], ranging from water transport in soils [6] [7], plants [8] [9] and biomembranes [10] to water filtration, catalysis [11], print [12] and Lab-on-a-Chip [13] [14] technologies. It is also of increasing importance in the synthesis of hybrid materials [15], [16] [17] by meltinfiltration [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The np-Au MEAs ( Figure A2 B) were fabricated using a hybrid approach that merges rapid prototyping techniques [ 28 ] and corrosion-driven nanostructure self-assembly [ 29 ]. Briefly, glass microscope slides were piranha-cleaned followed by sputter-deposition of a stack of blanket metal layers (chrome adhesion layer, gold seed layer and gold-silver alloy layer) as described previously [ 16 ] and similar to how the samples for macro-scale electrochemical cell have been fabricated.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%