2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2010.08.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Confidentiality risks in fine scale aggregations of health data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(22 reference statements)
0
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In terms of privacy protection, the risk of uncovering individual locations at an aggregated dataset to a zip code level is considered very low. However, aggregated data to the zip code level is often too abstract to uncover relationships related to the physical or cultural neighborhood [2]. For example, the use of zip code aggregated healthcare datasets to link patients' recovery outcomes after hospital discharges may encompass several culturally diverse neighborhoods, but the risk of reverseengineering the geo-coded data is low.…”
Section: Aggregationmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In terms of privacy protection, the risk of uncovering individual locations at an aggregated dataset to a zip code level is considered very low. However, aggregated data to the zip code level is often too abstract to uncover relationships related to the physical or cultural neighborhood [2]. For example, the use of zip code aggregated healthcare datasets to link patients' recovery outcomes after hospital discharges may encompass several culturally diverse neighborhoods, but the risk of reverseengineering the geo-coded data is low.…”
Section: Aggregationmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…As a result, there has been an increasing pressure on these providers to share health information with external researchers, academics, and business contractors [7]. However, sharing healthcare data with external partners is a major challenge due to privacy provisions (e.g., HIPAA) and concerns; maps have the potential to be reverse-engineered to reveal Protected Health Information (PHI) about individuals [2]. Although researchers have attended to risks associated with spatial confidentiality, there is an understanding between researchers and healthcare organizations, that much work is still needed to generate well-established guidelines or frameworks to overcome these risks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In general, decreasing the amount of disclosure risk by applying more stringent geographic masking processes also decreases the accuracy of inferences obtainable from the released data source (Karr et al, 2006). While there is a wide understanding of this tradeoff between disclosure risk and data utility, there is no consensus on a particular methodology to visualize and share confidential data without dramatically limiting any analyses (Curtis et al, 2011).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One aggregation approach, areal aggregation, enumerates the total existing within a predefined political or administrative entity, whereas a second approach, point aggregation, assigns individual records to a single location representing a subset of the original locations (Armstrong et al, 1999). The ubiquitousness of this masking method is likely attributed to the ease for local data custodians, who may be technically or resource limited, to conduct this technique (Curtis et al, 2011). Armstrong et al denoted four means in which the ability of the researcher to detect clusters or investigate potential relationships is compromised by employing aggregation (Armstrong et al, 1999).…”
Section: Geographic Perturbation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%