2016
DOI: 10.1177/0969733016654315
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Confidentiality, anonymity and amnesty for midwives in distress seeking online support – Ethical?

Abstract: Background

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 100 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such failures also carry significant and adverse financial implications, as well as having a detrimental impact upon any recruitment and retention strategies in place (The Royal College of Physicians, 2015). Unfortunately however, healthcare professionals may be reluctant to ask for help, or to report a colleague in need of support due to embarrassment, fear of punishment or discipline, and concerns about losing their professional license (Cares et al, 2015;Monroe, Todd and Kenaga, 2011;Pezaro, S. et al, 2016). This is of particular concern within midwifery populations, as midwives can be subjected more frequently to restrictive actions from regulators than other healthcare professionals, particularly in cases relating to drug and alcohol use (Spittal et al, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such failures also carry significant and adverse financial implications, as well as having a detrimental impact upon any recruitment and retention strategies in place (The Royal College of Physicians, 2015). Unfortunately however, healthcare professionals may be reluctant to ask for help, or to report a colleague in need of support due to embarrassment, fear of punishment or discipline, and concerns about losing their professional license (Cares et al, 2015;Monroe, Todd and Kenaga, 2011;Pezaro, S. et al, 2016). This is of particular concern within midwifery populations, as midwives can be subjected more frequently to restrictive actions from regulators than other healthcare professionals, particularly in cases relating to drug and alcohol use (Spittal et al, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%