1986
DOI: 10.1093/jee/79.4.887
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Confidence Limits and Sample Size in Quarantine Research

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
24
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 143 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 1 lists the projected exposures, ( Ct ) p , to cause a specified percentage mortality in the treated population, a , in this case 95%, 99%, and 99.9968% (respectively, LE 95 , LE 99 , and LE P9 ) and the corresponding estimates of the bounds [upper (UL) and lower (LL) limits] at the 95% confidence level (CL). Probit 9 (P9) projections, where a = 99.9968% mortality, 43 are often prone to bounds that span an order of magnitude, or greater, which can decrease confidence in the utility of probit analysis. Moreover, it is difficult to confirm probit 9 projections when test insects are difficult to rear in numbers approaching 100 000, such as the case for BMSB (diapausing and nondiapausing).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 1 lists the projected exposures, ( Ct ) p , to cause a specified percentage mortality in the treated population, a , in this case 95%, 99%, and 99.9968% (respectively, LE 95 , LE 99 , and LE P9 ) and the corresponding estimates of the bounds [upper (UL) and lower (LL) limits] at the 95% confidence level (CL). Probit 9 (P9) projections, where a = 99.9968% mortality, 43 are often prone to bounds that span an order of magnitude, or greater, which can decrease confidence in the utility of probit analysis. Moreover, it is difficult to confirm probit 9 projections when test insects are difficult to rear in numbers approaching 100 000, such as the case for BMSB (diapausing and nondiapausing).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…a = 100 × n r . Mortality was also expressed as a function of the number of specimens treated via probit analysis of Finney (1944) at the 95% confidence level (CL), as further derived in Couey and Chew (1986). All specimens, treated as well as nontreated controls, were frozen and archived at SJVASC, with a subset dissected for confirmation of diapause.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lower bound estimate of mortality level ( Y ) at 95% CI for each replicate was derived from the formula: Y = 10log(0.05)/ x where x is the number of estimated treated individuals in the replicate. The formula was derived from Equation 3b in Couey and Chew (1986) for the case of zero survivors in a specified sample size.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%