2002
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20011266
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Confidence levels of evolutionary synthesis models

Abstract: Abstract. In terms of statistical fluctuations, stellar population synthesis models are only asymptotically correct in the limit of a large number of stars, where sampling errors become asymptotically small. When dealing with stellar clusters, starbursts, dwarf galaxies or stellar populations within pixels, sampling errors introduce a large dispersion in the predicted integrated properties of these populations. We present here an approximate but generic statistical formalism which allows a very good estimation… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
154
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 109 publications
(159 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
5
154
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The transition between the two regimes happens in the age range 4-5.5 Ma and it is due to a softening of the ionizing continua in such age range. Comparing with the evolution of the cluster T eff , defined as in Mas-Hesse & Kunth (1991), the change in the slope is associated with a cluster T eff ∼ 3.5×10 4 K following the results from Cerviño & Mas-Hesse (1994) and Cerviño et al (2002b) 3 . Such cluster T eff is not due to the predominance of a specific type of star but to a mix of different types of stars.…”
Section: Collisional Linesmentioning
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The transition between the two regimes happens in the age range 4-5.5 Ma and it is due to a softening of the ionizing continua in such age range. Comparing with the evolution of the cluster T eff , defined as in Mas-Hesse & Kunth (1991), the change in the slope is associated with a cluster T eff ∼ 3.5×10 4 K following the results from Cerviño & Mas-Hesse (1994) and Cerviño et al (2002b) 3 . Such cluster T eff is not due to the predominance of a specific type of star but to a mix of different types of stars.…”
Section: Collisional Linesmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…EW(Hβ) depends mainly on the metallicity (Cerviño & Mas-Hesse 1994) and age of the cluster with almost no variations due to the size of the cluster, if sampling effects are not considered (but see Cerviño et al 2000Cerviño et al , 2002b.…”
Section: Hβ Equivalent Widthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evolutionary synthesis models assume average numbers of stars with different effective temperatures and luminosities determined by the stellar evolution and the stellar birth rate: the number of stars with a given mass that were born at a given time (parametrized by the initial mass function, IMF, and the star formation history, SFH). The averages correctly describe the asymptotic properties of clusters with infinite (or a very large) number of stars (see Cerviño & Valls-Gabaud 2009;Cerviño & Luridiana 2005, for more detailed explanations). In more realistic cases, this proportionality is only valid as the average of several clusters, but it is not always a reliable representation of individual clusters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Some of these can be quantified using selected information provided by continuous population synthesis models (e.g. Lançon & Mouhcine 2000;Cerviño et al 2002;Cerviño & Luridiana 2004, 2006, but others require using discrete population synthesis models (Barbaro & Bertelli 1977;Girardi & Bica 1993;Bruzual 2002;Deveikis et al 2008;Piskunov et al 2009;Popescu & Hanson 2010). The predicted luminosity and colour distributions depend strongly on the total mass (or star number) in the cluster, and can be far from Gaussian even when the total mass exceeds 10 5 M .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%