2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.electstud.2020.102216
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Confidence in an election authority and satisfaction with democracy: Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment of a failed election in Sweden

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Besides helping us better verify that official results match voters' true intentions, identifying patterns in form-based irregularities can also shed light on the underpinnings of perceptions of electoral management bodies' legitimacy (e.g., Kerr 2014;Lundmark, Oscarsson, and Weissenbilder 2020), in turn better illuminating the relationship between electoral integrity and democratic legitimacy (e.g., Mattes 2014). Understanding this relationship among irregularities, electoral integrity, and democratic legitimacy is increasingly important in the era of social media, which aids in the diffusion of problematic forms 8 -and exacerbates the spread of misinformation around them (Allcott and Gentzkow 2017).…”
Section: Assessing Election Integrity Using Statutory Formsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides helping us better verify that official results match voters' true intentions, identifying patterns in form-based irregularities can also shed light on the underpinnings of perceptions of electoral management bodies' legitimacy (e.g., Kerr 2014;Lundmark, Oscarsson, and Weissenbilder 2020), in turn better illuminating the relationship between electoral integrity and democratic legitimacy (e.g., Mattes 2014). Understanding this relationship among irregularities, electoral integrity, and democratic legitimacy is increasingly important in the era of social media, which aids in the diffusion of problematic forms 8 -and exacerbates the spread of misinformation around them (Allcott and Gentzkow 2017).…”
Section: Assessing Election Integrity Using Statutory Formsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Por su parte, la GE implica el manejo cuidadoso de la tecnología, los recursos, las relaciones entre las organizaciones interesadas y la comunicación de información al público, centrada principalmente en las elecciones (James, 2017;Garnett, 2022). Por tanto, los órganos de GE, responsables de la realización, gestión y monitoreo de las elecciones, constituyen el foco del proceso electoral y de la integridad electoral percibida por los votantes (Lundmark et al, 2020). Como se observa, la tecnología hace parte de la definición de la GE y juega un rol relevante en el respaldo de la actividad humana involucrada en el despliegue del ciclo electoral y su transparencia (Micheni y Murumba, 2018).…”
Section: Marco Teórico O Referencialunclassified
“…In cluster 6, the dominant keyword is democracy. Articles that are relevant to that keyword are articles written by Lundmark et al (2020) entitled "Confidence in an election authority and satisfaction with democracy: Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment of a failed election in Sweden. This study shows that using the case of the 2010 Sweden regional election, which had to be repeated because of procedural errors in voting, it resulted in a decline in public trust.…”
Section: Table 1 Cluster and Items Of Concept In Electoral Studies 20...mentioning
confidence: 99%