Confessions of a colour blind optometrist

Lian

2006

Background : People with abnormal colour vision often report difficulty seeing coloured berries and flowers in foliage, which suggests they will have a diminished capacity for visual search when target objects are marked out by colour. There is very little experimental evidence of the effect of abnormal colour vision on visual search and none relating to search for objects in natural foliage. Method : We showed 79 subjects with abnormal colour vision (seven protanopes, 10 deuteranopes, 16 protanomals and 46 deuteranomals) and 20 subjects with normal colour vision photographs of natural scenes and asked them to locate clumps of red berries, to trace the length of a red string on grass and to name the season depicted in a photograph taken in the Autumn and the same scene photographed in the Summer. Colour vision was assessed using the Ishihara, the Medmont C100, the Farnsworth D15, the Richmond HRR and the Nagel anomaloscope. Results : All the subjects with abnormal colour vision located fewer clumps of red berries than those with normal colour vision. The subjects who failed the Farnsworth D15 performed significantly worse than those who passed but the distribution of scores in the two groups overlaps. The majority of subjects with abnormal colour vision could not trace the full length of the string: only 38 per cent of anomalous trichromats who passed the Farnsworth D15 test and three per cent of those who failed it were able to trace the full length of the string. Fifty-five per cent of those classed as having a mild deficiency by the HRR test could trace the whole string. Most dichromats were unable to identify the Autumn season and those who did may have been assisted by guessing. Most (94 per cent) of those who passed the Farnsworth D15 test and all those classified as having a 'mild' deficiency by the HRR test could identify the season. Conclusions : All people with abnormal colour vision, even those with a very mild deficiency, have some degree of impairment of their ability to see coloured objects in natural surroundings. A pass at the Farnsworth D15 test or a 'mild' classification with the Richmond HRR test identifies those likely to have the least problems with visual search and identification tasks. The results have practical implications for the selection of personnel in occupations that involve visual search in natural terrain.

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 80%

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Search for coloured objects in natural surroundings by people with abnormal colour vision

Lian

2006

“…2 They also report that they do not see blushing. 71 These transformations to deuteranopic (centre) and protanopic (right) colour perceptions of a red eye demonstrate this problem. Figure 6A.…”

Section: Defective Colour Vision That Is Sufficiently Mild To Enable mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…They may enable some colour vision tests to be passed by altering the colours in the test but there is little evidence that they are beneficial in everyday colour tasks, 1,60 except to help differentiate colours that look the same to the CVD observer (for example, using a red filter to distinguish retinal haemorrhage from melanin pigment). 71 Great variability in loss of colour discrimination but almost all will experience some problems with colour 5 although if the CVD is mild, they will not necessarily be of any practical consequence. All are unsuitable for precise colour matching tasks either because of loss of colour discrimination or anomalous metameric colour matching or both.…”

Section: Defective Colour Vision That Is Sufficiently Mild To Enable mentioning

confidence: 99%

Assessment of inherited colour vision defects in clinical practice

2007

121

127

Background: Colour vision deficiency (CVD) has a high prevalence and is often a handicap in everyday life. Those who have CVD will be better able to adapt and make more informed career choices, if they know about their deficiency. The fact that from 20 to 30 per cent of adults with abnormal colour vision do not know they have CVD suggests that colour vision is not tested as often as it should be. This may be because of practitioner uncertainty about which tests to use, how to interpret them and the advice that should be given to patients on the basis of the results. The purpose of this paper is to recommend tests for primary care assessment of colour vision and provide guidance on the advice that can be given to patients with CVD. Methods: The literature on colour vision tests and the relationship between the results of the tests and performance at practical colour tasks was reviewed. Results: The colour vision tests that are most suitable for primary care clinical practice are the Ishihara test, the Richmond HRR 4th edition 2002 test, the Medmont C‐100 test and the Farnsworth D15 test. These tests are quick to administer, give clear results and are easy to interpret. Tables are provided summarising how these tests should be interpreted, the advice that can be given to CVD patients on basis of the test results, and the occupations in which CVD is a handicap. Conclusion: Optometrists should test the colour vision of all new patients with the Ishihara and Richmond HRR (2002) tests. Those shown to have CVD should be assessed with the Medmont C‐100 test and the Farnsworth D15 test and given appropriate advice based on the test results.

“…Some of the colour vision deficient doctors who completed Spalding's que~tionnaire'~ recalled their difficulty with titrations in chemistry, as does Cockburn in a paper in this issue. 75 It has also been shown that doctors and diabetic patients with colour vision deficiency make errors with the Glucostix test of urinary g l~c o s e .~~~~~…”

Section: Chemical Colour Indicatorsmentioning

confidence: 99%

The handicap of abnormal colour vision

2004

126

All people with abnormal colour vision, except for a few mildly affected deuteranomals, report that they experience problems with colour in everyday life and at work. Contemporary society presents them with increasing problems because colour is now so widely used in printed materials and in computer displays. Equal opportunity law gives them protection against unfair discrimination in employment, so a decision to exclude a person from employment on the grounds of abnormal colour vision must now be well supported by good evidence and sound argument. This paper reviews the investigations that have contributed to understanding the nature and consequences of the problems they have. All those with abnormal colour vision are at a disadvantage with comparative colour tasks that involve precise matching of colours or discrimination of fine colour differences either because of their loss of colour discrimination or anomalous perception of metamers. The majority have problems when colour is used to code information, in man-made colour codes and in naturally occurring colour codes that signal ripeness of fruit, freshness of meat or illness. They can be denied the benefit of colour to mark out objects and organise complex visual displays. They may be unreliable when a colour name is used as an identifier. They are slower and less successful in search when colour is an attribute of the target object or is used to organise the visual display. Because those with the more severe forms of abnormal colour vision perceive a very limited gamut of colours, they are at a disadvantage in the pursuit and appreciation of those forms of art that use colour.