2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2006.12.032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cone production in young post-fire Pinus contorta stands in Greater Yellowstone (USA)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
36
1
3

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
5
36
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…But, according to equation (11) the seed yields produced by the average tree may also be linked to cone characteristics such as C#/T and CMT since they were good explanatory variables of seed production. These results corroborate that tree size is the overriding factor in determining its reproduction and fructification ability, as previously demonstrated by others researchers (Greene et al, 1999;Ordonez et al, 2005;Turner et al 2007, Carrasquinho et al, 2010. Thus, it is obvious that any factor affecting tree/crown dimension will at the same time affect the cone/seed production.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…But, according to equation (11) the seed yields produced by the average tree may also be linked to cone characteristics such as C#/T and CMT since they were good explanatory variables of seed production. These results corroborate that tree size is the overriding factor in determining its reproduction and fructification ability, as previously demonstrated by others researchers (Greene et al, 1999;Ordonez et al, 2005;Turner et al 2007, Carrasquinho et al, 2010. Thus, it is obvious that any factor affecting tree/crown dimension will at the same time affect the cone/seed production.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…In the same line, Ordonez et al (2005) found that large pine trees of Pinus nigra Arnold grown in Spain produced more cones than small trees and that the cone production varied with tree location. In a later study conducted by Turner et al (2007) with Pinus contorta, a complementary result was found, showing a strong positive relationship between mean tree size (stem diameter) and the average number of cones per tree. In other studies the fructification of coniferous tree species has been explained by the complexity of the interaction between the temporal and the spatial variation of the individual tree size characteristics (Ayari et al, 2010;Krannitz and Duralia, 2004;Menccucini et al, 1995).…”
Section: Fructification Of Aleppo Pine Forests In North Africamentioning
confidence: 73%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, in the face of well-documented variation in the fecundity of single parent trees (e.g. Greenberg 2000;Turner et al 2007), such a belief may be quite misleading. Given small dispersal distances and a rapidly decreasing probability of seed fall with increasing distance from the parent, variation in ground seed density may be additionally enhanced by heterogeneity in local stand density, as for example in multi-layered forests or stands regenerated by an irregular shelterwood method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%