Cone-beam computed tomography versus orthopantomography in sinus lift procedures: Two-dimensional versus three-dimensional imaging

Kumar, Saurabh; Hobeira, Hazza Al; Aljanakh, Mohammad D; Shaikh, Sameer; Ponnuse, Kurian; Muthusamy, Deivanayagi

doi:10.4103/ssj.ssj_53_17

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…One of the possible ways to assess the effect of particle size on the fi nal graft could be by measuring the bone density obtained at 6-8 months after the healing of the bone fi lling, at which time the implants could also be placed [17,18]. [17,20,21].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Bone Quality Obtained in Sinus Lifting with Anorganic Bovine Bone. A CBCT Study

Melisa¹,

Constanza²,

Carlos³

2020

Int J Oral Craniofac Sci

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: Quantitatively assess bone density in maxillary sinus lifting with ABB (Bio-Oss®), using Cone-Beam computed tomography 6 months after surgery. Material and methods:A retrospective observational study was conducted between February 2018 and February 2019 on 33 Cone-Beam tomographic studies of 29 adult patients of both genders, with maxillary sinus fl oor lift, using Bio-Oss® small particles ( 0.25-1um), large particles (1-2um) or a 50-50 % mix of both, always using Bio-Gide® membranes, in order to measure bone density through Hounsfi eld Units (UH) after 6 months of healing. Results:The average density of the grafted sinuses was 586 ± 238 HU, corresponding to Type II-III bone. Gender (p = 0.079) and Residual bone (p = 0.681) showed no signifi cant differences, while Age (p = 0.015) and Particles Size (p = 0.002; p <0.05), were signifi cant. The highest tomographic density was obtained in patients older than 65 years; and in mixed particles size grafts. Conclusion:The bone density obtained after maxillary sinus lifting with Bio-Oss shows quantitative values similar to those of type II-III bone, providing a high degree of predictability for implant placement 6 months after the intervention.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%