Abstract:Background
Computed tomography in standing horses has revolutionized diagnostic imaging. The O-arm®, a cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scanner with a gantry opening of 96.5 cm is routinely used for image-guided spine and neurosurgery in humans. The aim of this study is to describe the set-up and first experiences using the O-arm® to achieve CBCT imaging of the head in standing horses.
CT imaging of the predefined region of interest (ROI) was tested on 2 cadaveric heads, concentra… Show more
“…The lower number of acquisitions can be explained by the smaller anatomy of extremities that usually can easily be covered by one acquisition of the fixed cylindrical volume. The extremities seem to be less affected by the respiratory swaying, which is not the case in the head and neck 8 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…In comparison with standing CBCT of the head in standing sedated horses, the median number of acquisitions per region of interest is only one-half. 8 The lower number of acquisitions can be explained by the smaller anatomy of extremities that usually can easily be covered by one acquisition of the fixed cylindrical volume. The extremities seem to be less affected by the respiratory swaying, which is not the case in the head and neck.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CBCT scanner, technical setup, and scanning procedure used in this study have been described elsewhere. 7,8 In brief, a mobile CBCT unit originally designed and FDA-approved for intraoperative applications in surgical theatres with an inner gantry diameter of 96.5 cm (Medtronic O-Arm; Medtronic AG) was used for image acquisition. The gantry itself is mobile in all three dimensions and can be tilted around its horizontal and vertical axis.…”
Objective: To report on the feasibility, indications, and diagnostic yield of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) of horses' extremities performed under standing sedation. Study design: Retrospective clinical case series. Sample population: Fifty-nine CBCT examinations in 58 horses. Methods: Examinations were categorized for indications for CBCT dependent on a suspicion, presence, or absence of a diagnosis prior to CBCT. The number of acquisitions per examination, total time for the examination, diagnostic score of each acquisition (diagnostic, diagnostic-compromised, nondiagnostic), and additional diagnostic information regarding preexisting diagnostic information were recorded. Results: Three (median) acquisitions were performed per examination in a median study time of 14 minutes. In 24 of 33 cases with a suspected diagnosis, this diagnosis was confirmed or definitively refuted; in seven of 33 cases, the suspected diagnosis was refuted without a new diagnosis; and, in two of 33 cases, the suspected diagnosis could not be confirmed nor could a new diagnosis be made. In five of nine cases without a preexisting diagnosis, a diagnosis was established. In 16 cases with a diagnosis prior to CBCT, additional information was recorded, or a surgical plan was prepared. In 14 of 18 cases in which additional contrast techniques were used, additional information was gained. Conclusion: Standing CBCT of the horses' extremities is feasible and can produce diagnostic information in a timely fashion. Clinical significance: The results provide evidence of the practicality and diagnostic potential of standing CBCT of horses' extremities. The results of this work were presented at the 41st Bain Fallon Memorial lectures; July 21-25,
“…The lower number of acquisitions can be explained by the smaller anatomy of extremities that usually can easily be covered by one acquisition of the fixed cylindrical volume. The extremities seem to be less affected by the respiratory swaying, which is not the case in the head and neck 8 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…In comparison with standing CBCT of the head in standing sedated horses, the median number of acquisitions per region of interest is only one-half. 8 The lower number of acquisitions can be explained by the smaller anatomy of extremities that usually can easily be covered by one acquisition of the fixed cylindrical volume. The extremities seem to be less affected by the respiratory swaying, which is not the case in the head and neck.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CBCT scanner, technical setup, and scanning procedure used in this study have been described elsewhere. 7,8 In brief, a mobile CBCT unit originally designed and FDA-approved for intraoperative applications in surgical theatres with an inner gantry diameter of 96.5 cm (Medtronic O-Arm; Medtronic AG) was used for image acquisition. The gantry itself is mobile in all three dimensions and can be tilted around its horizontal and vertical axis.…”
Objective: To report on the feasibility, indications, and diagnostic yield of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) of horses' extremities performed under standing sedation. Study design: Retrospective clinical case series. Sample population: Fifty-nine CBCT examinations in 58 horses. Methods: Examinations were categorized for indications for CBCT dependent on a suspicion, presence, or absence of a diagnosis prior to CBCT. The number of acquisitions per examination, total time for the examination, diagnostic score of each acquisition (diagnostic, diagnostic-compromised, nondiagnostic), and additional diagnostic information regarding preexisting diagnostic information were recorded. Results: Three (median) acquisitions were performed per examination in a median study time of 14 minutes. In 24 of 33 cases with a suspected diagnosis, this diagnosis was confirmed or definitively refuted; in seven of 33 cases, the suspected diagnosis was refuted without a new diagnosis; and, in two of 33 cases, the suspected diagnosis could not be confirmed nor could a new diagnosis be made. In five of nine cases without a preexisting diagnosis, a diagnosis was established. In 16 cases with a diagnosis prior to CBCT, additional information was recorded, or a surgical plan was prepared. In 14 of 18 cases in which additional contrast techniques were used, additional information was gained. Conclusion: Standing CBCT of the horses' extremities is feasible and can produce diagnostic information in a timely fashion. Clinical significance: The results provide evidence of the practicality and diagnostic potential of standing CBCT of horses' extremities. The results of this work were presented at the 41st Bain Fallon Memorial lectures; July 21-25,
“…In a study in which multislice CT and cone beam CT were compared, however, Watanabe et al ( 39 ) showed that a smaller voxel size does not always improve spatial resolution as this may also depend on both the in-plane and longitudinal directed modulation-transfer function. Nevertheless, cone beam CT has not yet become area-wide established in equine dentistry due to various limitations, such as substantial sensitivity to motion artifacts, higher scatter, or a limited dimension of the field of view (FOV) ( 31 ). Additional artifacts of cone beam CT are alias artifacts by x-ray beam divergence and a higher noise level ( 38 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Domanska-Kruppa et al ( 15 ) just recently introduced conventional two-dimensional (2D) x-ray based cephalometry to investigate class II malocclusion and IIA using distinct cephalometric landmarks in Warmblood foals. Current advances of head CT in standing sedated horses ( 29 – 31 ) may allow for methodical standardization as well as single tooth measurements and will make 3D cephalometry clinically applicable.…”
The angle encompassed between opposing incisors in horses is assumed to decline with age. Previous studies merely consider the overall profile view of clinical crowns presuming a generalized angle, neglecting potential tooth position-dependent differences. Cephalometric measurements from 3D computed tomographic thick-slab reconstructions of single incisors within a global reference frame were used to determine clinical crown interincisal angulation (IIA) of 48 horses. Based on predefined dentoalveolar landmarks, IIA was defined as the angle enclosed by the respective labial axis of the clinical crown (LACC). A measurement repeatability analysis was conducted including a comparison of third incisor teeth IIA with data obtained by cephalometric implementation of previously described landmarks for third incisor teeth (lingual/palatal border). The age-related angle course and differences between tooth positions were investigated considering LACCs of permanent incisors. Determining IIA by LACCs exhibited a high level of reproducibility applying for all tooth positions (mean coefficient of variation = 0.65 %; mean SD ± 0.89°). The comparison method for third incisor teeth revealed two times higher mean dispersion of repeated measurements,
P
= 0.017. A non-linear model slightly increased predictability of angular changes over time as against linearity assumption. The angle decline was more distinctive in younger horses and appears to approach a final value in older ones. Third incisor teeth exhibited significantly higher angle decline compared to first and second incisor teeth,
P
< 0.0001. According to the results, age determination of horses using clinical crown IIA is not recommended. Rather, 3D cephalometry may provide a promising tool to determine interdental and dentofacial angles of distinct tooth positions in health and disease.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.