Cone-beam computed tomography assessment of root canal transportation using WaveOne Gold and Neoniti single-file systems

Vallabhaneni, Saritha; Fatima, Kainath; Kumar, Twino H

doi:10.4103/jcd.jcd_206_17

Cited by 11 publications

(12 citation statements)

References 27 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…12,22,23 To study the performance of the instruments examined through the whole canal length, the analysis of three different canal levels-apical, middle, and coronal levels, represented by 3 mm, 5 mm, and 7 mm from the apex, respectively, was performed. 21,24,25 The results of this study showed that at the middle and the coronal levels, there was no significant difference between the four groups in canal centering ratio or the amount of canal transportation. However, at the apical level, WaveOne Gold files showed the best centering ratio and the least amount of canal transportation.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 66%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Comparison of Shaping Ability of Different Single-File Systems Using Microcomputed Tomography

2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objectives To evaluate the shaping ability of four different single-file systems using micro-computed tomography (micro-CT). Materials and Methods Eighty mesiobuccal and mesiolingual canals of permanent mandibular molars were randomly assigned to four groups according to the file used; WaveOne Gold, RECIPROC Blue, HyFlex EDM, and One Shape (n = 20). The samples were scanned using micro-CT for the preinstrumentation record; then the canals were instrumented and scanned for the postinstrumentation records. Statistical Analysis The data were then analyzed statistically using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with the level of significance set at α = 0.05. Results The results of canal centering ratio and canal transportation showed that no significant difference was found among the four file groups at the middle and the coronal levels. However, a significant difference was found at the apical level (p < 0.05), where WaveOne Gold showed the best centering ratio and the least amount of canal transportation. The change in the canal volume was significant at the coronal level (p < 0.05), whereas the change in the canal volume was higher for the HyFlex EDM group than the other groups. No significant difference was found between the other groups at the apical level, middle level, or in the total percentage of canal volume. Conclusion WaveOne Gold produced a more centralized canal preparation with a lesser amount of transportation at the apical level. HyFlex EDM showed the highest canal volumetric change at the coronal level. The interim design of the endodontic files has a high impact on the behavior of the file inside the root canal.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 66%

“…32 Previous studies showed similar performance for WaveOne Gold. 25,33,34 It was found that all the four groups showed a centering ratio more than one at the apical level indicating the tendency of all the instruments used to prepare more of the outer surface of the canal curvature rather than the inner surface. 17…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 97%

Comparison of Shaping Ability of Different Single-File Systems Using Microcomputed Tomography

2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 94%

“…The presence of curved canals can be challenging during root canal preparation and are not always detected clearly on periapical radiographs, which can cause undesirable shaping errors (Vallabhaneni et al 2017, Yammine et al 2017. In this study, singlerooted mandibular premolars with root curvatures ranging from 20°to 30°were used.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effect of larger apical size on the quality of preparation in curved canals using reciprocating instruments with different heat thermal treatments

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aim To evaluate the influence of larger apical canal enlargement in curved canals using reciprocating systems subjected to various heat treatments. Methodology Ninety mandibular premolars with root curvatures ranging from 20° to 30° were selected and scanned by microcomputed tomography (micro‐CT) before and after root canal preparation with reciprocating systems (n = 30): Reciproc Blue (RB size 25, .08 taper and size 40, .06 taper; VDW, Munich, Germany), WaveOne Gold (WOG size 25, .07 taper and size 35, .06 taper; Dentsply Sirona, Ballaigues, Switzerland) and ProDesign R (PDR size 25, .06 taper and size 35, .05 taper; Easy Dental Equipment, Belo Horizonte, Brazil). Canal transportation, untouched areas, and apical and total root canal volumes were measured. Statistical analysis was performed with the nonparametric Kruskal–Wallis and Dunn's tests and a significance level set at 5%. Results The between‐group comparison revealed no significant difference in untouched areas, canal transportation, and apical root canal volume among the groups (P > 0.05). However, WOG size 35, .06 taper was associated with a significant increase in the percentage of total canal volume in comparison to the PDR size 35, .05 taper (P < 0.05). The within‐group comparison revealed a significant decrease in untouched areas, increase in apical and total root canal volume for all groups when using a larger instrument (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in transportation among the groups and when a larger apical preparation was created (P > 0.05). Conclusions Larger apical enlargement of curved canals was associated with a decrease in untouched areas, an increase in root canal volume and maintenance of canal trajectory. In addition, all systems were safe and provided similar root canal shapes.

show abstract

“…The presence of curved canals can be challenging during root canal preparation and could not be clearly detected by periapical radiographs, which can cause undesirable shaping errors (YAMMINE et al, 2017;VALLABHANENI et al, 2017). During all the studies, single-rooted tooth with oval shaped canal with root curvatures ranging from 15° to 35° were used.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Analysis of the quality of root canal preparation and retreatment using different instruments associated or not with different irrigant agitation protocols

Duque¹

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Ao meu orientador, Prof. Dr. Clovis Monteiro Bramante, pelo exemplo de dedicação, doação e amor a esta nobre profissão. Obrigado pela orientação segura e criteriosa na elaboração deste trabalho e também por todos os ensinamentos transmitidos durante este período de convivência. Foi uma honra ser orientado do senhor. Minha sincera gratidão! Ao Prof. Dr. Marco Antonio Hungaro Duarte, exemplo de ser humano e profissional. Seus ensinamentos, incentivo e dedicação à profissão foram essenciais para mim durante toda a pós-graduação. Obrigado pela amizade, confiança e oportunidades a mim cedidas. Serei eternamente grato! Ao Prof. Dr. Rodrigo Ricci Vivan pela amizade, ensinamentos e oportunidades que me concedeu. Por ser um exemplo de como podemos chegar a qualquer lugar se nos esforçarmos e dedicarmos. Serei eternamente grato! Ao prof. Ivaldo Gomes de Moraes (in memorian) pelos ensinamentos científicos, mas, principalmente, por permitir eu ter o privilégio de conviver e aprender sobre a vida e como ser um homem de verdade! O senhor sempre será um exemplo de ser humano para mim. Saudades!

show abstract

Cone-beam computed tomography assessment of root canal transportation using WaveOne Gold and Neoniti single-file systems

Cited by 11 publications

References 27 publications

Comparison of Shaping Ability of Different Single-File Systems Using Microcomputed Tomography

Comparison of Shaping Ability of Different Single-File Systems Using Microcomputed Tomography

Effect of larger apical size on the quality of preparation in curved canals using reciprocating instruments with different heat thermal treatments

Analysis of the quality of root canal preparation and retreatment using different instruments associated or not with different irrigant agitation protocols

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About