2021
DOI: 10.3390/children8010038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Condylar Changes in Children with Posterior Crossbite after Maxillary Expansion: Tridimensional Evaluation

Abstract: (1) Background: To investigate condylar position in subjects with functional posterior crossbite comparing findings before and after rapid maxillary expansion (RME) treatment through 3D analysis; (2) Methods: Thirty-two Caucasian patients (14 males, mean age 8 y 8 m ± 1 y 2 m; 18 females mean age 8 y 2 m ± 1 y 4 m) with functional posterior crossbite (FPXB) diagnosis underwent rapid palatal expansion with a Haas appliance banded on second deciduous upper molars. Patients’ underwent CBCT scans before rapid pala… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 25 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results are in agreement with Ghoussoub et al [ 29 ], which found a significant transversal increase in the intercondylar distance in growing patients without CLP after rapid maxillary expansion using the Hyrax appliance. Additionally, some reports [ 29 , 30 ] have shown that maxillary expansion with the quad helix appliance does not cause significant changes in the condylar position in relation to the mandibular fossa. Holberg et al reported that bilateral and unilateral CLP patients experience greater skeletal expansion with the use of the quad-helix appliance than patients without CLP [ 31 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results are in agreement with Ghoussoub et al [ 29 ], which found a significant transversal increase in the intercondylar distance in growing patients without CLP after rapid maxillary expansion using the Hyrax appliance. Additionally, some reports [ 29 , 30 ] have shown that maxillary expansion with the quad helix appliance does not cause significant changes in the condylar position in relation to the mandibular fossa. Holberg et al reported that bilateral and unilateral CLP patients experience greater skeletal expansion with the use of the quad-helix appliance than patients without CLP [ 31 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%