2019
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1910.02589
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conductor-discriminant inequality for hyperelliptic curves in odd residue characteristic

Abstract: We prove a conductor-discriminant inequality for all hyperelliptic curves defined over discretely valued fields K with perfect residue field of characteristic not 2. Specifically, if such a curve is given by y, and if X is its minimal regular model over O K , then the negative of the Artin conductor of X (and thus also the number of irreducible components of the special fiber of X ) is bounded above by the valuation of disc(f ). There are no restrictions on genus of the curve or on the ramification of the spli… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this and the next section, there is quite some overlap with the articles [25] and [24], the reason being that our main assumptions and also our focus are somewhat different. For instance, in this article we can't afford to assume that the residue field k of our ground field K is algebraically closed, a very helpful assumption made in [25] and [24]. Another reason for being a bit repetetive is that we want to treat classical valuations and certain pseudovaluations on a equal footing.…”
Section: Inductive Valuationsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this and the next section, there is quite some overlap with the articles [25] and [24], the reason being that our main assumptions and also our focus are somewhat different. For instance, in this article we can't afford to assume that the residue field k of our ground field K is algebraically closed, a very helpful assumption made in [25] and [24]. Another reason for being a bit repetetive is that we want to treat classical valuations and certain pseudovaluations on a equal footing.…”
Section: Inductive Valuationsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…We use the methods of [26] and [25]. See [24] for a slightly different treatment of essentially the same results.…”
Section: Regular Models Of the Projective Linementioning
confidence: 99%
“…We would like to mention some alternative techniques that have been recently developed for investigating similar topics. In [6,16,[21][22][23], the authors determine different kinds of models, the conductor exponent, the local 𝐿-factor, compare the Artin conductor to the minimal discriminant and compute a basis of the integral differentials. In arbitrary residue characteristic (including 2), but under some technical assumptions, [8,12,20] determine the minimal regular model with normal crossings, a basis of integral differentials, reduction types, conductor and action of the inertia group on the 𝓁-adic representation.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this section we summarise definitions and results on MacLane valuations. Our main references are [KW], [Mac], [OS1] and [Rüt].…”
Section: Maclane Valuationsmentioning
confidence: 99%