2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.ssi.2004.07.072
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conductivity studies of composite polymeric electrolytes—from experiment to computer modeling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…90,94 The principle mechanism for the enhanced ionic conductivity has been known as the local formation of the amorphous phase of the polymer around each filler particle, which provides a preferential Li ion pathway. 99,104 However, the role of the filler in promoting the Li ion transport still remains to be addressed clearly. As mentioned, the polymer electrolyte with filler added also provided better Li/electrolyte interfacial compatibility, which strongly depended on the particle size 8 and/or the nature 105 of the filler.…”
Section: Polymer Electrolytementioning
confidence: 99%
“…90,94 The principle mechanism for the enhanced ionic conductivity has been known as the local formation of the amorphous phase of the polymer around each filler particle, which provides a preferential Li ion pathway. 99,104 However, the role of the filler in promoting the Li ion transport still remains to be addressed clearly. As mentioned, the polymer electrolyte with filler added also provided better Li/electrolyte interfacial compatibility, which strongly depended on the particle size 8 and/or the nature 105 of the filler.…”
Section: Polymer Electrolytementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is probably due to the increase of the resistive interfacial areas and the decrease of the effective conducting volume. 54 Li ion transference number (t Li+ ) testing shows a value of ∼0.21 for all the three ceramic/polymer composite electrolyte, compared to 0.17 for PE50. This can be explained by the preferential adsorption of anions on the surfaces of the ceramic particles, 55,56 which is the case in our related work for LICGC TM particles.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…This can be ascribed to the interaction between the modified polymerceramic interface as reported before. 34,[52][53][54] Further increase of the ceramic loading to 30 wt% resulted in the decrease of the ionic conductivity. This is probably due to the increase of the resistive interfacial areas and the decrease of the effective conducting volume.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%