2006
DOI: 10.1063/1.2182027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conductivity of single-stranded and double-stranded deoxyribose nucleic acid under ambient conditions: The dominance of water

Abstract: We investigate the conductivity of single-stranded and double-stranded herring deoxyribose nucleic acid (DNA) in buffer solution spotted and dried on Au nanocontacts. We find an exponential increase of the conductivity with increasing humidity that is identical for single- and double-stranded DNA within the measurement accuracy. While the small conductivity of dry DNA is comparable to that of a large band-gap semiconductor, we attribute the increase at high humidity levels to water molecules accumulated at the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

14
80
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(94 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
14
80
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Exponential increases in conductance values with increases in relative humidity (RH) for poly(GC) and poly(AT) DNAs have been reported, with a ∼10 6 difference in conductance values observed between 5 and 90% RH. The humidity-dependent conductivity and negligible changes between ds-and singlestranded DNA were speculated to be due to ionic conduction in the water layer within the bulk film [47]. Our measurements are performed through well defined device structures with the electrode-electrode separation distances comparable with the length of the 15-bp ds-DNA.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Exponential increases in conductance values with increases in relative humidity (RH) for poly(GC) and poly(AT) DNAs have been reported, with a ∼10 6 difference in conductance values observed between 5 and 90% RH. The humidity-dependent conductivity and negligible changes between ds-and singlestranded DNA were speculated to be due to ionic conduction in the water layer within the bulk film [47]. Our measurements are performed through well defined device structures with the electrode-electrode separation distances comparable with the length of the 15-bp ds-DNA.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effect of humidity on DNA conductance has been previously studied by various groups [47][48][49][50], generally through measurements performed with relatively thick layers of much longer DNAs and using device structures that provide an electrode-electrode separation distance much larger than the length of a single oligonucleotide. In this regime, the overall conductance is dominated by molecule-to-molecule transfer (probably hopping or ion-mediated transport).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The result is a smaller self-energy and a larger resulting conductivity. Surprisingly, experiments on individual DNA molecules [9], DNA films [10,11,12,13], and DNA bundles [7,8] all show a similar exponential dependence of conductivity on humidity. The lack of a geometry-dependent difference remains a puzzle.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…36,37 Hydrophilic phosphoric acid chains control the number of water molecules adsorbed on the DNA fragments, as suggested by Otsuka et al 36 and Ha et al 37 Also, the effect of environment on the DNA fragments after drying cannot be ignored. 38,39 Under high humidity levels, water molecules will further accumulate on the phosphate backbone of DNA fragments. 39 Electrical measurements in this paper are conducted in a laboratory facility with daily average humidity levels between 30% and 45%.…”
Section: Scheme 1 Schematic Diagram Of Template Growth Ofmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…38,39 Under high humidity levels, water molecules will further accumulate on the phosphate backbone of DNA fragments. 39 Electrical measurements in this paper are conducted in a laboratory facility with daily average humidity levels between 30% and 45%. Therefore, ssDNA(II) fragments bear negative charges with water molecules surrounding them.…”
Section: Scheme 1 Schematic Diagram Of Template Growth Ofmentioning
confidence: 99%