2015
DOI: 10.1007/s00542-015-2435-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conductivity of high-temperature annealed silicon direct wafer bonds

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(4 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
(19 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The calculated resistance of the bulk silicon in the dies was between 15 and 96 m , which is significantly lower than the measured resistances of 2.2 . The current density of 1.1 × 10 4 A/m 2 in F200 dies at 50 mV was significantly lower than the 15 This difference does indicate that the current is restricted across the bonded interface produced by the plasma activated direct bonding method presented in this paper.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 58%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The calculated resistance of the bulk silicon in the dies was between 15 and 96 m , which is significantly lower than the measured resistances of 2.2 . The current density of 1.1 × 10 4 A/m 2 in F200 dies at 50 mV was significantly lower than the 15 This difference does indicate that the current is restricted across the bonded interface produced by the plasma activated direct bonding method presented in this paper.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…The current density of 1.1 × 10 4 A/m 2 in F200 dies at 50 mV was significantly lower than the current densities of 4.0-6.2 × 10 4 A/m 2 obtained on high-temperature annealed Si directly bonded dies. 15 This difference does indicate that the current is restricted across the bonded interface produced by the plasma activated direct bonding method presented in this paper. The linear, ohmic behavior observed on the dies in the current study is in contrast to the non-linear I-V curve reported by Amirfeiz et al and by Raeissi et al 11,12 The reason for the discrepancy is unknown, but it could be related to differences in silicon surface activation process, or to differences in sample preparation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 2 more Smart Citations