2007
DOI: 10.1515/epoly.2007.7.1.1335
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conductivity and Thermal Analysis Studies of Solid Polymeric Electrolytes Based on Plasticized Hydroxyethyl Cellulose

Abstract: Transparent film samples of hydroxyethyl cellulose (HEC) based on solid polymeric electrolytes (SPE) were prepared by the plasticization of HEC with glycerol and addition of lithium perchlorate salt. SPEs with different quantities of glycerol and LiClO 4 were studied by electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS), Dynamic Mechanical Thermal Analysis (DMTA), TGA (Thermogravimetric Analysis) and DSC (Differential Scanning Calorimetry). The ionic conductivity measurements revealed that the sample containing [O]/… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
10
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…As observed in this figure the best transmittance values were obtained for the sample plasticized with 68 wt.% and the worst transmittance values with the sample plasticized with 70 wt.% of glycerol. The reason for such a big difference can be due to the exudation process, already observed in HEC-based samples and containing high quantity of plasticizer [7,16], and not to the thicknesses of the membranes, which were almost similar, i.e. 4.2 × 10 −2 and 3.9 × 10 −2 cm for the samples with 68 and 70 wt.% of glycerol, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As observed in this figure the best transmittance values were obtained for the sample plasticized with 68 wt.% and the worst transmittance values with the sample plasticized with 70 wt.% of glycerol. The reason for such a big difference can be due to the exudation process, already observed in HEC-based samples and containing high quantity of plasticizer [7,16], and not to the thicknesses of the membranes, which were almost similar, i.e. 4.2 × 10 −2 and 3.9 × 10 −2 cm for the samples with 68 and 70 wt.% of glycerol, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…7 evidences a 10-15% loss of mass from ambient temperature to 120 • C of pure pectin and pectin-based samples, respectively, which can be attributed to free water loss. At this point it should be stated that both glycerol and lithium perchlorate are hydrophilic substances and their presence promotes an increased water absorption capacity of the film [16]. In the region of 200-260 • C, a pure pectin sample showed a very accentuated mass loss of 40%, which can be attributed to the decomposition, and continues slowly with the increase of temperature up to 800 • C. The remaining residue was 14%.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 evidence a 5-15% loss of mass from ambient temperature to ≈120 • C of pure pectin and pectin-based samples, which can be attributed to free water loss. At this point it should be stated that glycerol and lithium perchlorate are hydrophilic substances and their presence promotes an increase of the water absorption capacity of the film [16]. Moreover, all studied samples present a characteristic two or three-step thermal degradation, typical of pectin [17][18][19].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 and 3, we can see that the samples have no water. At this point, it should be stated that even glycerol is a hydrophilic substance and its presence does not promote water; when compared with agar-based electrolytes with less amount of glycerol, an increased water absorption capacity of the film is observed for other natural polymer electrolyte-based membranes [30].…”
Section: Thermal Behavior Of Electrolytesmentioning
confidence: 99%