2017
DOI: 10.1117/12.2260404
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conductive polymer sensor arrays for smart orthopaedic implants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, a piezoresistive polymer with low wear rates and good biocompatibility could be used as a force-sensing smart implant in applications where UHMWPE is used today, including knee, hip and shoulder arthroplasty. 102 Similarly, force sensors and their signal conditioning circuits that are integrated into the polyethylene insert have also been developed. 101 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, a piezoresistive polymer with low wear rates and good biocompatibility could be used as a force-sensing smart implant in applications where UHMWPE is used today, including knee, hip and shoulder arthroplasty. 102 Similarly, force sensors and their signal conditioning circuits that are integrated into the polyethylene insert have also been developed. 101 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many different existing sensing mechanisms could potentially meet the clinical need for quantitative force sensing, including capacitive, resistive, piezoresistive, optical, triboelectric, magnetic, passive resonator and FET-based sensors 31 . Capacitive sensors have limited spatial resolution compared to resistive ones, but have a higher reliability [32][33][34][35][36][37] . Flexible microfluidic force sensors have been made previously for tactile and haptic sensing [38][39][40] , but could not reach the high forces required in this application.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sensors and trial implant provide minimal modification to the insert itself during surgery. Existing devices in the literature either modify the implant geometry 24,36,46 , which has been deemed expensive and technically challenging 31 , disturb the contact zone between the femoral head and acetabular cup 45,47 , or are implanted away from the contact area and therefore do not directly measure contact forces 48 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To analyze loads in orthopedic implants, a three-dimensionally (3D)-printed sensor array (composed of PANI structures embedded in a polymeric parent phase) was developed. , Linear outputs following fractional changes in resistance occurring during incrementally applied loads, were obtained. For the detection of micromotion, eddy current sensors and factors that affect the sensitivity and range of sensors implanted in the tibia beneath the metallic plate were also investigated .…”
Section: Implant Integrating Sensorsmentioning
confidence: 99%