Conductive paste based interconnection for photovoltaic modules

Song, Hyunjoo; Shin, Woo Gyun; Yoon, Heesang; Hwang, Hye-Mi; Ju, Young Chul; Ko, Suk Whan; Kang, Min Gu; Lee, Jeong In; Song, Hee‐eun; Kang, Gi‐Hwan

doi:10.1109/pvsc.2018.8547639

Cited by 3 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 6 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Untuk menghitung sudut kemiringan panel surya di tunjukan pada persamaan 7. Dalam instalasi PLTS, diperlukan sudut kemiringan panel surya yang akurat [6], [7]. Perhitungan ini dilakukan untuk memperoleh pancaran sinar matahri yang optimal di area Laboratorium FT UM Surabaya.…”

Section: ………(6)unclassified

Analisis Perencanaan Pembangkit Listrik Tenaga Surya 400 WP di Gedung Laboratorium Terpadu Universitas Muhammadiyah Surabaya

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

- The rooftop of the University of Muhammadiyah Surabaya Integrated Laboratory building which has an area of 210 m2 can be used as a solar power plant (PLTS). Installing PLTS in buildings has several advantages, namely as a long-term energy investment and easy to integrate with the grid electrical system. PLTS is designed to save electricity consumption. In addition, if PLTS is connected to a battery, it can meet some of the energy needs at night. To design a PLTS installation in the Integrated Laboratory building, this research uses technical and economic analysis methods. Technical analysis is carried out to determine the capacity and number of PV mini-grid components required for installation. While the economic analysis aims to calculate the investment costs and the length of time for the return on investment compared to buildings without PV mini-grid installations. Based on this research, the results show that the amount of energy required for the Integrated Laboratory building is 482.148 kWh, while the planned PLTS is able to provide energy of 216,128 kWh. The PLTS design requires an initial investment of Rp. 927,700,894,-. So by using the Payback Period (PP) method, it can be concluded that the planned design is feasible, because the comparison of the cost of return on investment is 9.13 years faster than the project age that has been determined previously, which is 20 years.

show abstract

Section: ………(6)unclassified