2020
DOI: 10.1002/smtd.202000396
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conductive Metal–Organic Frameworks: Design, Synthesis, and Applications

Abstract: fabricated. Combined with controlled synthesis, MOF materials are endowed with abundant various of structures, morphologies, and properties. [8-11] In addition, the as-prepared MOFs can be artificially modified via postsynthetic approaches utilizing their available pores and active sites of metal clusters or linkers. [12,13] As a result, not only the number of MOFs is further increased but also many interesting properties, such as high specific surface areas, tailorable pore sizes, modifiable structures, and p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
67
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 228 publications
(298 reference statements)
0
67
0
Order By: Relevance
“… 40 43 Moreover, incorporating single-site Cu on BPYDC also can result in the energetic overlap between Th 6 nodes and the ligand, thus promoting the charge transport by the “through-bond” route. 44 The electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) measurements were also carried out. As revealed by Nyquist curves in Figure S6 , incorporating single-site Cu into Th-BPYDC can significantly decrease the interfacial charge transfer resistance between catalysts and electrolyte, 45 which implies the enhanced conductivity of Cu@Th-BPYDC, well consistent with the results of electrical conductivity in Th-BPYDC and Cu@Th-BPYDC.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 40 43 Moreover, incorporating single-site Cu on BPYDC also can result in the energetic overlap between Th 6 nodes and the ligand, thus promoting the charge transport by the “through-bond” route. 44 The electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) measurements were also carried out. As revealed by Nyquist curves in Figure S6 , incorporating single-site Cu into Th-BPYDC can significantly decrease the interfacial charge transfer resistance between catalysts and electrolyte, 45 which implies the enhanced conductivity of Cu@Th-BPYDC, well consistent with the results of electrical conductivity in Th-BPYDC and Cu@Th-BPYDC.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fortunately, with the high tunability in molecular structures, many feasible approaches have been developed in recent years to manipulate their electronic structure, thus overcoming their major drawback and facilitating efficient electron transfer. [37][38][39] Moreover, various arrangement combinations of inorganic or organic units potentially give rise to new physical phenomena, [40,41] and versatile regulation strategies of S, σ, and κ can thus be anticipated in pursuing higher ZT values.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So far, there have been several review articles specifically focused on the improvement of electrical conductivity for MOFs targeted at applications of electrochemical sensing, photovoltaic devices, electrocatalysis, and energy storage. [37,38,42] Whereas, the requirement of improving electrical conductivity for thermoelectrics is notably different from it for other applications. However, the improvement of electrical conductivity for MOFs targeted at applications of thermoelectrics is still a great challenge because, for example, promoting charge transfer via increasing charge carrier density would lead to the decrease of the Seebeck coefficient as the two parameters are interdependent and subjected to certain laws of physics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The R ct values for Ni‐HXR and NiFe‐HXR are lower than those for traditional MOFs (Figure 2e), indicating that integrating “through‐bond” and “through‐space” strategy into one MOF can enhance charge carrier efficiency. Moreover, the bimetallic NiFe‐HXR exhibits significantly superior charge transfer dynamics with regard to monometallic Ni‐HXR and commercial IrO 2 benchmark, which is ascribed to the enhanced charge transport through node to node induced by strong interaction between Ni and Fe nodes [21] . To further investigate the origin of the excellent performance in NiFe‐HXR, the electrochemical surface areas (ECSA) that is proportional to the double layer capacitances ( C dl ) was determined by CV method (Figure S7).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%