2023
DOI: 10.3390/jcdd10110448
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conduction System Pacing for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy

Óscar Cano,
Javier Navarrete-Navarro,
Pablo Jover
et al.

Abstract: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) via biventricular pacing (BiVP-CRT) is considered a mainstay treatment for symptomatic heart failure patients with reduced ejection fraction and wide QRS. However, up to one-third of patients receiving BiVP-CRT are considered non-responders to the therapy. Multiple strategies have been proposed to maximize the percentage of CRT responders including two new physiological pacing modalities that have emerged in recent years: His bundle pacing (HBP) and left bundle branch ar… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 99 publications
(187 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Growing interest is observed in this form of pacing, mostly due to its potential to achieve an optimal hemodynamic response. The implantation technique is more complex, and the support of an electrophysiology recoding system is necessary; however, this pacing modality does not disturb synchronous ventricular contraction in patients with a narrow QRS complex, and, in patients with intraventricular conduction abnormalities, it provides effective resynchronization, and thus practically eliminates the risk of pacemaker-induced cardiomyopathy development [ 12 , 16 ]. Cardiologists proceeding with electrotherapy who commonly use CSP are firmly convinced that this is the best possible form of cardiac pacing, offering a natural advantage over any other pacing modality, including BiV pacing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Growing interest is observed in this form of pacing, mostly due to its potential to achieve an optimal hemodynamic response. The implantation technique is more complex, and the support of an electrophysiology recoding system is necessary; however, this pacing modality does not disturb synchronous ventricular contraction in patients with a narrow QRS complex, and, in patients with intraventricular conduction abnormalities, it provides effective resynchronization, and thus practically eliminates the risk of pacemaker-induced cardiomyopathy development [ 12 , 16 ]. Cardiologists proceeding with electrotherapy who commonly use CSP are firmly convinced that this is the best possible form of cardiac pacing, offering a natural advantage over any other pacing modality, including BiV pacing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%