1986
DOI: 10.1115/1.3225900
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conduction of Heat in Solids, Second Edition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
158
0
5

Year Published

1997
1997
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 319 publications
(166 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
158
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, Eq. (10) is widely known in the theory of heat conductivity and diffusion [20] and also in the description of quasistatic electromagnetic fields, Foucault currents, and the skin effect in conductors [21]. The previously derived parabolic equation is valid whenever the following inequalities are satisfied…”
Section: Maxwell Equations and The Electromagnetic Areamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, Eq. (10) is widely known in the theory of heat conductivity and diffusion [20] and also in the description of quasistatic electromagnetic fields, Foucault currents, and the skin effect in conductors [21]. The previously derived parabolic equation is valid whenever the following inequalities are satisfied…”
Section: Maxwell Equations and The Electromagnetic Areamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under a constant supply of electric power, heat is then generated from the hot wire at a constant rate and transfers into the sample surrounding it mainly by conduction. If we consider the sample as a semi-infinite cylindrical system, in which a line heat source is vertically placed, then the heat conduction equation can be written as follows: 34) ................. (1) Here, Q corresponds to the heat generation per unit length of the hot wire. Solving this equation gives us:…”
Section: Non-steady-state Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Characteristic length scales for diffusion include the membrane thickness and the environmental length scale associated with the pesticide transport distance once released. Numerous historical and mathematical descriptions for pesticide loss from microcapsules can be found elsewhere (Carslow and Jaeger, 1959;Collins and Doglia, 1973;Collins, 1974;Kydenieus, 1980, Coswar, 1981Crank, 1993;Mogul et al, 1996) C = concentration of pesticide within the capsule (assumed uniform throughout capsule). C o = initial concentration of pesticide within the capsule for t ≤ 0.…”
Section: Diffusion Model Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%