1930
DOI: 10.1152/ajplegacy.1930.94.2.448
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conduction in Different Parts of the Small Intestine

Abstract: The APS Journal Legacy Content is the corpus of 100 years of historical scientific research from the American Physiological Society research journals. This package goes back to the first issue of each of the APS journals including the American Journal of Physiology, first published in 1898. The full text scanned images of the printed pages are easily searchable. Downloads quickly in PDF format.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1932
1932
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The stimuli, for example, pinching or longitudinal as well as transversal stretching of the intestinal wall (4,5,7,9,13,15,17), insertion of the bolus into the intestinal lumen (4,5,8,13), distension of the intestinal wall by insertion of the balloon (5,16,21), application of NaCl-crystal on the serosal surface or electric stimulation of the intestinal wall (2,3,4,5,7,17,19) would be capable of producing the mixed responses of different origin. Bozler (7) and Borchardt (6) tried to stimulate the mucosa only, but their results do not agree with ours in that they could not observe the inhibitory effect anally, so that Bozler doubt whether the inhibition should be considered as a part of the so-called myenteric reflex effects or not.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The stimuli, for example, pinching or longitudinal as well as transversal stretching of the intestinal wall (4,5,7,9,13,15,17), insertion of the bolus into the intestinal lumen (4,5,8,13), distension of the intestinal wall by insertion of the balloon (5,16,21), application of NaCl-crystal on the serosal surface or electric stimulation of the intestinal wall (2,3,4,5,7,17,19) would be capable of producing the mixed responses of different origin. Bozler (7) and Borchardt (6) tried to stimulate the mucosa only, but their results do not agree with ours in that they could not observe the inhibitory effect anally, so that Bozler doubt whether the inhibition should be considered as a part of the so-called myenteric reflex effects or not.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%