1986
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.33.3749
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conduction-electrong-factor measurements in platinum

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the alkali metals [1] the Zeeman splitting is found to be isotropic, but the g factor deviates from the free-electron value of 2. On the other hand, in Rh [2], Pd [3,4], Ir [5], and Pt [6,7] the cyclotron-orbit g factor (g c ) is found to be strongly anisotropic, and it is also known that in Pd and Pt the average g factor is large. The g c factor in the noble metals [8] also shows a strong anisotropy.…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the alkali metals [1] the Zeeman splitting is found to be isotropic, but the g factor deviates from the free-electron value of 2. On the other hand, in Rh [2], Pd [3,4], Ir [5], and Pt [6,7] the cyclotron-orbit g factor (g c ) is found to be strongly anisotropic, and it is also known that in Pd and Pt the average g factor is large. The g c factor in the noble metals [8] also shows a strong anisotropy.…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Experimental results are from Ref. [6]. term, the LSDA with spherically averaged densities, and the parametrized exchange-correlation potential from von Barth and Hedin [16] serves as a useful tool for calculating the electronic structure of metals in external magnetic fields.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the corresponding ODF scheme traditionally used in older stellar atmosphere computations, the problem is the same and was discussed for example in Saxner & Gustafsson (1984), where it was concluded that the cost in increased computing time as function of the number of individual opacity species made it unfeasible to continue the ODF scheme for cooler stars. Newer stellar models are therefore usually computed based on the opacity sampling scheme, as discussed for example in Jorgensen (1992), Gustafsson & Jorgensen (1994), and Helling & Jorgensen (1998). It is, however, not obvious how one should treat the strong atomic lines correctly in the opacity sampling scheme, and if these are important in exoplanetary atmospheres alongside with the multitude of molecular lines, the correlated-k method may turn out to be superior, or a new hybrid method may be needed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Noteworthy are the works by Krishna Swamy (1969) and Gustafsson et al (1975); the latter in particular constitutes the first extended grid of theoretical 1D model atmospheres of giant stars with metallicities ranging from solar down to [Fe/H]= −3. ‡ Since then, 1D model stellar atmospheres have been continuously developed and improved (see, e.g., reviews by Gustafsson & Jorgensen 1994, Asplund 2005, especially with regard to input physics and opacities, and are still nowadays the most widely used models in stellar abundance analyses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%