2015
DOI: 10.1134/s1990793115050231
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conduction current and extraneous electric current in the global electric circuit

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
8
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
2
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…GPS observations also show the strong positive TEC disturbances exceeding 80% and located northeast of the epicenter. They are similar to the seismogenic disturbances reported in [6,7], with the exception of the magnetic conjugation and daytime appearance. An increase in the vertical electric currents does not lead to the appearance of the strong positive TEC disturbances in that area in either the UAM-T or the UAM-M calculations.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…GPS observations also show the strong positive TEC disturbances exceeding 80% and located northeast of the epicenter. They are similar to the seismogenic disturbances reported in [6,7], with the exception of the magnetic conjugation and daytime appearance. An increase in the vertical electric currents does not lead to the appearance of the strong positive TEC disturbances in that area in either the UAM-T or the UAM-M calculations.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…In the present calculations, two current density values were used: j s = 20 nA/m 2 and j s = 40 nA/m 2 . The last value is 1000 times higher than the fair-weather currents and about the same order of magnitude as the thunderstorm currents densities [7]. In the calculations of present model for the period from 25 December 2015 to 3 January 2016, including the disturbances of December 31-January 1, we used the spatial distribution of the FACs dependencies on AE and Kp as described above and the spatial distributions of the precipitating electron fluxes depending on Kp according to the statistical model of auroral electron precipitation [4].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 78%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This electric field can penetrate into the ionosphere and create perturbation in the electron density by E  B plasma drift mechanism 22 . In previous studies it was shown that seismic activity leads to an increase in the quasi-static electric field in the ionosphere which reaches ~10 mV/m, while its value on the earth's surface is ~100 V/m 23,24 . The field is localized in the ionosphere over the epicentre area, as well as, the related region with a characteristic horizontal scale of 100 to 1000 km depending upon magnitude of earthquake.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%