Conducting Research with Tribal Communities: Sovereignty, Ethics, and Data-Sharing Issues

Abstract

Background: When conducting research with American Indian tribes, informed consent beyond conventional institutional review board (IRB) review is needed because of the potential for adverse consequences at a community or governmental level that are unrecognized by academic researchers.Objectives: In this article, we review sovereignty, research ethics, and data-sharing considerations when doing community-based participatory health–related or natural-resource–related research with American Indian nations and present a model material and data-sharing agreement that meets tribal and university requirements.Discussion: Only tribal nations themselves can identify potential adverse outcomes, and they can do this only if they understand the assumptions and methods of the proposed research. Tribes must be truly equal partners in study design, data collection, interpretation, and publication. Advances in protection of intellectual property rights (IPR) are also applicable to IRB reviews, as are principles of sovereignty and indigenous rights, all of which affect data ownership and control.Conclusions: Academic researchers engaged in tribal projects should become familiar with all three areas: sovereignty, ethics and informed consent, and IPR. We recommend developing an agreement with tribal partners that reflects both health-related IRB and natural-resource–related IPR considerations.

What Drives Academic Data Sharing?

“…The authors demand that a patient "needs to have the ability to think about his or her choice to participate or not and the ability to actually act on that decision". De Wolf et al [84], Harding et al [85], Mennes et al [86], Sheather [87] and Kowalczyk and Shankar [88] take the same line regarding the necessity of informed consent between researcher and study subject. Axelsson and Schroeder [63] describe the maxim to act upon public trust as an important precondition for database research.…”

Advancing Suicide Prevention Research With Rural American Indian and Alaska Native Populations

“…89 AI/AN communities, with their unique status as domestic dependent nations, are increasingly demanding that researchers actively engage them in identifying potential benefits and harms of research at both individual and community levels of analysis. 90 To achieve this, researchers must understand the ethical and political dimensions of their research, and AI/AN community members must fully understand the realities and conventions that drive both research objectives and processes. This degree of involvement frequently requires capacity building as well as prolonged relationship and trust-building activities, 72,91,92 which the current funding climate does not typically support.…”

Indigenous Community Health and Climate Change: Integrating Biophysical and Social Science Indicators

“…For guidance on developing and enacting culturally appropriate data and material sharing agreements with Indigenous communities, see Harding et al (2012).…”