2021
DOI: 10.1177/16094069211043744
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conducting Research Using Online Workshops During COVID-19: Lessons for and Beyond the Pandemic

Abstract: Social distancing rules in the time of the COVID-19 pandemic have necessitated a move to online research for many social science researchers. In moving data collection online, academic literature on Internet-mediated research has resurfaced and been enriched, providing researchers with a useful resource when planning data collection online. In sharp contrast, there is limited published work for online workshops, indicating new opportunities for developing an evidence base for this increasingly important approa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
(49 reference statements)
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Approval processes can be efficient without compromising the research integrity process through IRBs: (1) ensuring that the standard of ethical review is not relaxed; (2) ensuring that informed consent is always secured, despite the PHE, whilst ensuring efficient use of resources; (3) considering issues such as strict exclusion and inclusion criteria, participant compensation and reimbursements, as well as well-defined risks of the study to vulnerable participants; (4) improving their expediency during PHEs and (5) strengthening online processes such as placing template case report forms and ethics forms online for online entry and modification and being continuously informed of research progress (Bailey et al, 2020 ; Cagnazzo et al, 2021 ; Hashem et al, 2020 ; Rania et al, 2021 ; Roshan das et al, 2021 ; Shamsuddin et al, 2021 ; Walker et al, 2021 ; Waterhouse et al, 2020 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Approval processes can be efficient without compromising the research integrity process through IRBs: (1) ensuring that the standard of ethical review is not relaxed; (2) ensuring that informed consent is always secured, despite the PHE, whilst ensuring efficient use of resources; (3) considering issues such as strict exclusion and inclusion criteria, participant compensation and reimbursements, as well as well-defined risks of the study to vulnerable participants; (4) improving their expediency during PHEs and (5) strengthening online processes such as placing template case report forms and ethics forms online for online entry and modification and being continuously informed of research progress (Bailey et al, 2020 ; Cagnazzo et al, 2021 ; Hashem et al, 2020 ; Rania et al, 2021 ; Roshan das et al, 2021 ; Shamsuddin et al, 2021 ; Walker et al, 2021 ; Waterhouse et al, 2020 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous publications reviewed (Bailey et al, 2020 ; Cagnazzo et al, 2021 ; Fleming et al, 2020 ; Hashem et al, 2020 ; Roshan das et al, 2021 ; Rothwell et al, 2021 ; Shamsuddin et al, 2021 ; Waterhouse et al, 2020 ) highlighted significant gaps in standard processes involved in patient recruitment, participant participation and informed consent, under pre-COVID-19 conditions, with these intensified within the ICT realm created by remote working. These gaps that straddle between remote working practices and intensified use of ICT for research processes raised an important theme that of a need to carefully scrutinise these research processes for current and future research.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…During the COVID-19 pandemic, workshops were adapted for online delivery, including provision of routers/internet access for all students in need. While there are challenges, both practical and methodological, in running workshops online, the workshops were well received and less costly [ 27 , 28 ]. We were not able to offer experimental lab workshop but we introduced two new workshops; ‘Bioentrepreneurship: Small Molecule Therapeutic and Diagnostic Development’ and ‘Scientific Diplomacy’.…”
Section: Discussion and Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%