2015
DOI: 10.5204/ijcjsd.v4i1.199
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conducting Prison Research in a Foreign Setting

Abstract: This paper discusses the process of conducting prison research in France. Drawing on a study conducted with a sample of prisoners in a maximum-security facility in Paris, this article outlines the major challenges relating to access, data collection, and dissemination of results in correctional research. It also addresses some of the barriers that are inherent to prison research conducted in a setting foreign to the researcher. The value and place of prison research in the field of criminology are also discuss… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
(23 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because of the very short length of the majority of French prison sentences, we could not wait until months after the elections nor take our time to develop a rigorous framework for our study: most prisoners in a position to vote for the EU elections would have left prison by then. Obtaining access to a French prison can also be an extremely slow process, full of obstacles and disappointments (Kazemian 2015). As it was, we had approximately two to three months to obtain access, and to think about, and develop, our protocol.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of the very short length of the majority of French prison sentences, we could not wait until months after the elections nor take our time to develop a rigorous framework for our study: most prisoners in a position to vote for the EU elections would have left prison by then. Obtaining access to a French prison can also be an extremely slow process, full of obstacles and disappointments (Kazemian 2015). As it was, we had approximately two to three months to obtain access, and to think about, and develop, our protocol.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prior knowledge of how things work in a prison facility has been touted as important to researchers in turning potential disruptions by security protocols during data collection to the researcher’s advantage (Fox et al, 2011; Johnson et al, 2015). During this study, with prior knowledge of the mandatory number checking and food collection schedules, I was able to structure the interviews so that mandatory breaks during interviews were not disruptive (as reported by prevailing prison-based researchers; Kazemian, 2015), but a time to reflect on previous participant responses to prompt in-depth probing upon recommencement of the interviews. It was also a time to gain the trust and nurture professional relationships with gatekeepers, which later softened the rigid supervision regimes of the early days of data collection.…”
Section: Dealing With Security Protocols Emotions and Maintaining Met...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It would require longitudinal data collected at several points during the period of incarceration with questions of a potentially sensitive nature (i.e., offending, mental health outcomes, etc.). This might pose problems with institutional review boards, which are highly sensitive to research involving vulnerable populations (for an account of the tedious IRB process involved in prison research, see Kazemian, ). In addition, research of this nature requires the cooperation of the Department of Corrections and the willingness to provide additional staff and resources when researchers are present in the facility, which can be a tall order when resources are limited.…”
Section: Suggestions Going Forwardmentioning
confidence: 99%