2015
DOI: 10.1017/iop.2015.84
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conducting Ethical Research With Big and Small Data: Key Questions for Practitioners

Abstract: The focal article (Guzzo, Fink, King, Tonidandel, & Landis, 2015) sought to “raise awareness and provide direction with regard to issues and complications uniquely associated with the advent of big data,” (p. 492), and we commend their success in offering Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology (SIOP) members a solid foundation and resources on which to draw. Our aim here is to extend their position, particularly to drive the conversation toward concrete recommendations for how industrial and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In summary, building evidence-based and ethical HR analytics capabilities that foster trust and transparency is critically important to the success of any HR analytics effort. Each member of the HR analytics team plays a vital role as ethical researcher, analyst, interpreter, translator and educator (Dekas and McCune, 2015). Lastly, organizations need to think through how their HR analytical insights are derived, communicated and more importantly – used (Illingworth, 2015).…”
Section: Implications and Guidelines For Practicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In summary, building evidence-based and ethical HR analytics capabilities that foster trust and transparency is critically important to the success of any HR analytics effort. Each member of the HR analytics team plays a vital role as ethical researcher, analyst, interpreter, translator and educator (Dekas and McCune, 2015). Lastly, organizations need to think through how their HR analytical insights are derived, communicated and more importantly – used (Illingworth, 2015).…”
Section: Implications and Guidelines For Practicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note also that the ethical standards for informed consent are different for researchers (see Section 8.05 of the Code) developing selection tools than for those employing them. Guzzo, Fink, King, Tonidandel, and Landis (2015) discuss the implications of these requirements in some detail (see also Dekas & McCune, 2015 for further implications).…”
Section: Informed Consent In Assessmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Managing data participation and privacy expectations Dekas and McCune (2015) summarised several crucial questions for practitioners interested in using employee data in their data efforts. One of the questions asks if employers can expect employees to accept data collection as a form of research, and thus "assume [that] the research and application of findings are an expected or reasonable part of operating a business/organization" (Dekas and McCune, 2015, p. 564).…”
Section: Ethics Education For Employers and Employeesmentioning
confidence: 99%