2003
DOI: 10.1143/jjap.42.4680
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conductance of Al Nanocontacts under High Biases

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

2
9
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
2
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is also noted that the decrease in conductance while increasing bias voltages is also reported in experiments [36,37]. However, the decrease in experiments is just the decrease of peak heights in conductance histogram, and not the shift of the conductance peaks to lower values.…”
Section: Effects Of Relaxation On Currentssupporting
confidence: 53%
“…It is also noted that the decrease in conductance while increasing bias voltages is also reported in experiments [36,37]. However, the decrease in experiments is just the decrease of peak heights in conductance histogram, and not the shift of the conductance peaks to lower values.…”
Section: Effects Of Relaxation On Currentssupporting
confidence: 53%
“…Among the most exciting discoveries was that a single strand of gold atoms suspended between electrodes manifests conductance quantization in steps of G 0 =2e 2 /h [2] as electrode spacing is increased, where e is the electron charge and h is Planck's constant. Furthermore, other studies showed that an atomic-scale wire made of aluminum atoms exhibits more complicated and even more interesting features; that is, the plateaus of conductance steps are not flat but have a positive slope before the wire breaks [3,4]. This somewhat counterintuitive result implies that the conductance increases even though the electrodes are pulled apart.On the theoretical side, there are many first-principles studies for examining electronic structure and transport properties of atomic-scale wires using tight-binding approximation and/or the structureless jellium electrodes [5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13], some of which reported results consistent with experimental data.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8,[10][11][12] The latter two properties, in particular, are of key importance in understanding the stability of atomic wires under current flow. 12 Halbritter et al 13 and, more recently, Mizobata et al 14,15 have explored the mechanical stability of atom-sized Al wires. These authors found that the probability of forming single-atom contacts decreases with increasing bias and that it vanishes at a critical bias of about 1 V. 16,17 In addition, several samples exhibited low-bias instabilities ͑typically at biases of 100 mV or less͒ leading to breakup of the atomic wires.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2͑a͒ such force corresponds to a bias of about 0.8 V. This value compares very well with the reported experimental result of 0.8 V by Mizobata et al for singleatom Al contacts. 14,15 It is also evident that, on average and everything else being equal, larger voltages are required to break longer wires ͓Fig. 2͑a͔͒.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%