1996
DOI: 10.15288/jsa.1996.57.314
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conduct disorder among adolescent alcohol and drug abusers.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
120
3
4

Year Published

2003
2003
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 194 publications
(131 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
4
120
3
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Keeping in mind that we restricted the data analysis to a limited number of psychosocial factors, our study is consistent with other studies suggesting that youth with externalizing disorders (deviant behavior), that continue to affiliate with drug-using peers, and that have non-cohesive families are more likely to show a poorer course following treatment (e.g., [76][77][78]. Thus, relapse prevention strategies aimed at correcting risk associated with delinquency, peer drug use and family estrangement command attention in treatment.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Keeping in mind that we restricted the data analysis to a limited number of psychosocial factors, our study is consistent with other studies suggesting that youth with externalizing disorders (deviant behavior), that continue to affiliate with drug-using peers, and that have non-cohesive families are more likely to show a poorer course following treatment (e.g., [76][77][78]. Thus, relapse prevention strategies aimed at correcting risk associated with delinquency, peer drug use and family estrangement command attention in treatment.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…As noted in the introduction, several studies have shown the prognostic significance of co-occurring conduct disorder for drug-abusing youth (Brown, Gleghorn, Schuckit, Myers, & Mott, 1996;Crowley et al, 1998;Myers et al, 1995;Tomlinson, Brown, & Abrantes, 2004). An additional contribution of this study to this comorbidity literature is that our follow-up period is longer than the more typical shorter term follow-up periods in the literature, and we included a community-based control group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of high comorbidity with substance use disorders (Brown, Gleghorn, Schuckit, Myers, & Mott, 1996;, teens meeting criteria for conduct disorder (n=2) were not excluded. Overall, 9% of the 729 youths who responded to the flyer met eligibility criteria for the study, and most ineligibilities were due to psychiatric symptomatology, other drug involvement, or braces.…”
Section: Authorsmentioning
confidence: 99%