The Palgrave Handbook of Volunteering, Civic Participation, and Nonprofit Associations 2016
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-137-26317-9_27
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conducive Macro-Contexts Influencing Volunteering

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, the level of religiosity and economic situation are two main contextual characteristics found to explain formal volunteering or civic participation in general (e.g., Curtis, Baer, & Grabb, 2001; Ruiter & De Graaf, 2006). However, the empirical findings on these relations are mixed and there is still not enough knowledge of which and how contextual factors translate to individual decision to volunteer (Baer et al, 2016). While previous studies certainly have their own merits, they have only been based on cross-sectional data and, therefore, did not take into consideration how dynamic predictors, such as economic development, affect changes in formal volunteering across time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, the level of religiosity and economic situation are two main contextual characteristics found to explain formal volunteering or civic participation in general (e.g., Curtis, Baer, & Grabb, 2001; Ruiter & De Graaf, 2006). However, the empirical findings on these relations are mixed and there is still not enough knowledge of which and how contextual factors translate to individual decision to volunteer (Baer et al, 2016). While previous studies certainly have their own merits, they have only been based on cross-sectional data and, therefore, did not take into consideration how dynamic predictors, such as economic development, affect changes in formal volunteering across time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But other studies only find non-significant and therefore inconclusive results (for example, Hooghe & Botterman, 2012). Other studies do also find that density of civil society is reduced when population density increases -but, in sum, no clear pattern emerges with regard to the question of whether density of civil society is higher in rural areas (Baer et al, 2016).…”
Section: Regarding Density Of Civil Societymentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Although unevenly distributed over the life course, many of the included life events can occur in every stage of life. The impact of these events on volunteering behavior may be very different across distinct life stages (Baer et al, 2016). In different life stages, not only individual resources change but also their preferences for time allocation (Nesbit, 2012).…”
Section: Study Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%