2012
DOI: 10.1071/sh11091
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Condom migration resulting from circumcision, microbicides and vaccines: brief review and methodological considerations

Abstract: Until stronger evidence suggests that condom migration is unlikely, it is important to be mindful of the potential for condom migration to occur in response to biomedical interventions (circumcision, microbicides and vaccines).

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Specifically, the perception is that circumcised men, considering themselves armed with an ''invisible condom'', will be less inclined to practice, and women less able to negotiate, condom use [18,21,49,50]. In contrast, qualitative research in newly circumcised men has repeatedly revealed the view that circumcised men find condoms easier and more comfortable to use once the foreskin has been removed [51], and a modest increase in condom use was observed in the Kisumu trial [1].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, the perception is that circumcised men, considering themselves armed with an ''invisible condom'', will be less inclined to practice, and women less able to negotiate, condom use [18,21,49,50]. In contrast, qualitative research in newly circumcised men has repeatedly revealed the view that circumcised men find condoms easier and more comfortable to use once the foreskin has been removed [51], and a modest increase in condom use was observed in the Kisumu trial [1].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…must be considered as only part of a comprehensive prevention strategy to reduce the risk of HIV-1 infection and that other preventive measures should also be used” (FDA, 2012; Gilead Sciences Inc., 2012, p. 1). Questions about risk compensation behavior have arisen for each of the emerging HIV prevention technologies (Crosby et al, 2012; Eaton & Kalichman, 2007), and they will persist as the field progresses to study new drug candidates, delivery strategies, and mechanisms for preventing infection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is critical to convey that the gel offers increased protection to women for whom condom use is not feasible, while also reinforcing the message that women who are already consistently using condoms should NOT switch to only using microbicide gel (since this will decrease their level of HIV protection). Several research studies have indicated that people may stop using condoms if they have access to antiretroviral (ARV)-based prevention methods instead (Crosby, Ricks, & Young, 2012;Fowler, Arkell, Abouyannis, James, & Roberts, 2014). This potential for ''condom migration'' is particularly concerning, given the great strides that have been made in promoting condoms for HIV prevention.…”
Section: Communication Challengementioning
confidence: 99%