2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2010.12.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Condom Availability Program in an Inner City Public School: Effect on the Rates of Gonorrhea and Chlamydia Infection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
17
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
2
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consistent with findings from previous research (De Rosa et al, 2012; Wretzel et al, 2011), the condom dispenser initiative also achieved high awareness over a relatively short period of time. More than 70% of students had seen the condom dispensers in person, and many had heard or seen information about the dispensers from one or more sources.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Consistent with findings from previous research (De Rosa et al, 2012; Wretzel et al, 2011), the condom dispenser initiative also achieved high awareness over a relatively short period of time. More than 70% of students had seen the condom dispensers in person, and many had heard or seen information about the dispensers from one or more sources.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Awareness of such programmes and obtaining school condoms were associated with increased condom use (De Rosa et al, 2012). Additionally, making condoms available has been shown to be associated with a decrease in STI cases among young men aged 15–19 years (Wretzel et al, 2011). Despite a modest-sized literature on condom distribution programmes (Charania et al, 2011), there has been surprisingly little research on the perceived and actual impact of condom distribution programmes implemented on US college campuses (Butler et al, 2014).…”
Section: Understanding and Improving Condom Accessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(). Wretzel, Visintainer, and Koenigs () show that condom availability lowered STI rates in one school district.…”
Section: School Condom Distribution Programsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a dearth of experimental research examining the effect of condom presence on sexual decision making (Conner & Flesch, 2001; Gilmore et al, 2013). Yet, a core assumption of STI risk reduction programs is that the presence of a condom decreases the likelihood of unprotected intercourse (De Rosa et al, 2012), and some survey findings support this idea (Wretzel, Visintainer, & Pinkston Koenigs, 2011). To better inform STI risk reduction program development, experimental research is needed to determine whether condom presence (and/or other contextual factors) contributes to intentions to have sex.…”
Section: Condom Presencementioning
confidence: 99%