2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.pubrev.2006.02.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conditioning effect of prior reputation on perception of corporate giving

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

6
132
0
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 168 publications
(140 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
6
132
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, an appropriate strategy of communicating value creation (e.g., innovation-based strategy of creating social value; [60]) in consideration of stakeholder characteristics (e.g., stakeholder types, issue support, and social value orientation) and company characteristics (e.g., reputation, industry, and marketing strategies) [24] is needed to ensure that a natural or created fit or congruence is presented. Furthermore, previous studies support the preceding argument that the influence of the firm's previous reputation for creating positive value, particularly social value (i.e., donors' engagement in and collaboration with social enterprises enabling resource mobilization; [62]), is associated with customers' positive evaluation of the corporation's sponsorship of charitable causes [8,63,64].…”
Section: Value Creation and Congruencementioning
confidence: 62%
“…Hence, an appropriate strategy of communicating value creation (e.g., innovation-based strategy of creating social value; [60]) in consideration of stakeholder characteristics (e.g., stakeholder types, issue support, and social value orientation) and company characteristics (e.g., reputation, industry, and marketing strategies) [24] is needed to ensure that a natural or created fit or congruence is presented. Furthermore, previous studies support the preceding argument that the influence of the firm's previous reputation for creating positive value, particularly social value (i.e., donors' engagement in and collaboration with social enterprises enabling resource mobilization; [62]), is associated with customers' positive evaluation of the corporation's sponsorship of charitable causes [8,63,64].…”
Section: Value Creation and Congruencementioning
confidence: 62%
“…Compared to "true philanthropy", sponsorship, corporate giving, and CRM are activities that may involve commercial motivations and strategic factors [2]. Sponsorships and CRM are considered to be conditional and contaminated prosocial activities in terms of pure corporate philanthropy [26].…”
Section: Socially Responsible Corporate Activitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, because sponsorship and CRM are considered to be more conditional activities [15,26], these activities might arouse public suspicion about companies' hidden motives [15]. Corporate philanthropic giving, however, is considered to be the most effective prosocial activity to minimize public suspicion [26].…”
Section: Socially Responsible Corporate Activitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…4 No.2 February 2017: 108-122 http://dx.doi.org/10.15206/ajpor.2017 113 serve organizations and the community. In particular, researchers have examined whether CSR practices, such as corporate giving, could contribute to organizational development (Bae & Cameron, 2006;Hall, 2006). CSR activities make a contribution to the development of a democratic society and community.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%