1997
DOI: 10.1177/147078539703900102
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conditioning and Bias in Consumer Panels - Some New Results

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These researchers observe that panel conditioning has been singled out as 'the most significant risk attending panel data', but then they conclude that this is the result of speculation rather than direct evidence. Buck et al (1977) quote a number of studies that, on balance, do not seem to support any strong conditioning effect in relation to long-term purchasing panels.…”
Section: Respondent Conditioningmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These researchers observe that panel conditioning has been singled out as 'the most significant risk attending panel data', but then they conclude that this is the result of speculation rather than direct evidence. Buck et al (1977) quote a number of studies that, on balance, do not seem to support any strong conditioning effect in relation to long-term purchasing panels.…”
Section: Respondent Conditioningmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Approximately half of these exhibited purchase levels that slightly increased and half that slightly decreased, but only two categories showed statistically significant changes. Buck et al (1977) observe with regard to consumer purchasing panels that 'some of the work in this rather difficult research area is out of date or based on statistical designs that do not stand up well to critical examination'. For example, one reported study had a panel size of only 150 respondents.…”
Section: The Evidence On Panel Conditioningmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As well as being concerned about viewing discrimination, the panel controls and supporting systems must reflect the dynamics of panel membership. This means that it is critically important to identify groups who are difficult to recruit and retain and to ensure that they are always represented on the panel (Buck et al 1984). The alternative is a fundamental but possibly hidden problem.…”
Section: Panel Control Specificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, the authors found that the professional respondents produced higher-quality responses than their more novice counterparts, suggesting that they may take the survey response task more seriously. Furthermore, repeated survey participation by professional respondents may produce panel conditioning, where the respondent’s response behavior changes as they become more familiar with the survey and questionnaire ( Buck et al, 1977; Hillygus et al, 2014; Struminskaya & Bosnjak, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%