1933
DOI: 10.1037/h0073695
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conditioned behavior of isolated and grouped cockroaches on a simple maze.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
26
0
1

Year Published

1960
1960
1993
1993

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
3
26
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…number performing the task has also been observed in such diverse forms as cockroaches tPeriplaneta americana) (Gates & Allee, 1933) and shell parakeets (Melopsittacus undulatus) (Allee & Masure, 1936). In both of these studies, the decrease in performance was attributed to the distractive influence of aggression as the number of individuals performing the task increased.…”
mentioning
confidence: 72%
“…number performing the task has also been observed in such diverse forms as cockroaches tPeriplaneta americana) (Gates & Allee, 1933) and shell parakeets (Melopsittacus undulatus) (Allee & Masure, 1936). In both of these studies, the decrease in performance was attributed to the distractive influence of aggression as the number of individuals performing the task increased.…”
mentioning
confidence: 72%
“…The generalization which organizes these results is that the presence of others, as spectators or as coactors, enhances the emission of domi- 16 nant responses. We also know from extensive research literature that arousal, activation, or drive all have as a consequence the enhancement of dominant responses (22).…”
Section: The Presence Of Others As a Source Of Arousalmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…The latency period for ants in groups of two was only 28 minutes. The effects observed by Chen were limited to the immedi- 16 …”
Section: Perhaps the Most Dramatic Effect Of Co-action Is Reported Bymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other studies have reported that speed of running or swimming decreases across trials (e.g., Drew, 1939;Hill & Spear, 1962;Jensen & Cotton, 1960;Muntz, 1963;Renner, 1963). Still others have reported that speed increases (e.g., Gates & Allee, 1933;Melgren, 1972;Morgan & Fields, 1938;Tsang, 1938). The number of errors has also been found to increase (e.g., Tsang, 1938) or decrease across trials (e.g., Gates & Allee, 1933).…”
Section: Maze and Alley Studiesmentioning
confidence: 97%