The Warsaw Colloquium on Instrumental Conditioning and Brain Research 1980
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-009-8225-3_5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conditioned Audio-Visual Targeting Reflexes in Split Brain Cats

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2002
2002

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By contrast, neurobehavioural experiments carried out in animals suggest that callosal section has little or no effect on auditory localization behaviour (Moore et al, 1974;Casseday and Neff, 1975;Brunk et al, 1979). The absence of an effect may result from the use of experimental paradigms that do not provide an accurate assessment of sound localization.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…By contrast, neurobehavioural experiments carried out in animals suggest that callosal section has little or no effect on auditory localization behaviour (Moore et al, 1974;Casseday and Neff, 1975;Brunk et al, 1979). The absence of an effect may result from the use of experimental paradigms that do not provide an accurate assessment of sound localization.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Other factors which could have masked the presence of de®cits include small sample size (Moore et al, 1974), the type of stimulus (i.e. pure tones, which are mainly treated subcortically) and long stimulus duration, which would allow scanning by movement of the head (Moore et al, 1974;Casseday and Neff, 1975;Brunk et al, 1979). In fact, using a multiple-sound source paradigm and binaural presentation, Poirier et al (1993) found that acallosal individuals displayed a de®cit throughout the auditory ®eld.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%